On Oct. 5, 2015, 9:15 p.m., Akshay Rai wrote:
> > minor comment... Rest looks good. Remove CONSOLE_URL.
> 
> Akshay Rai wrote:
>     Thanks Purshotam for the review.
>     
>     I have one question. I see that the coordinator Id also needs a change as 
> it doesn't inject the right coord id for a subworkflow. Shall I make the 
> change in the same rb or should I create a separate one?

As per your email response, I have made the change in the same rb.


- Akshay


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/38088/#review101532
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 19, 2015, 6:50 a.m., Akshay Rai wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/38088/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 19, 2015, 6:50 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie, Purshotam Shah and Robert Kanter.
> 
> 
> Bugs: OOZIE-2346
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2346
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add super parent id and workflow depth information along with the other oozie 
> job information into the job conf.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   client/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/client/WorkflowJob.java e2ad6f2 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/WorkflowJobBean.java ef1f452 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/OozieJobInfo.java 4b13daa 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/action/oozie/SubWorkflowActionExecutor.java
>  854d621 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/CoordActionStartXCommand.java
>  98f356e 
>   core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/action/hadoop/TestOozieJobInfo.java 
> ceaef8b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38088/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested locally by running a subworkflow with and without a coordinator.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Akshay Rai
> 
>

Reply via email to