I'd resume this discussion. AFAICS, the lazy consensus for this topic among the PPMC is mapping the current PPMC members and committers structure to the graduated PMC members and committers structure.
This is doable and actually what Kvrocks does during its graduation. We can regard this round as a chance to review our contributors/committers and nominate them if desired. If this is the consensus, we can make an explicit agreement. Best, tison. Chojan Shang <[email protected]> 于2023年11月18日周六 21:16写道： > > I wholeheartedly endorse Xuanwo's perspective. > > Let's promote actively involved committers as PMC members, recognizing their > recent contributions. Instead of promoting committers solely based on our > transition to TLP, let's emphasize their increased responsibilities and > active involvement in project governance. This approach aligns with our > commitment to fostering a culture of collaboration. > > This move marks an exciting milestone in our path towards becoming a TLP. > > Best regards, > PsiACE > > On 2023/11/18 11:13:33 tison wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is a sub-object on the project graduation - Have an agreement on the > > members of the PMC[1]. > > > > Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All > > members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC. > > > > I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP > > PMC unless there is a certain issue. > > > > And this thread is to reach a consensus on the proposal above. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/issues/3616 > >
