I suggest initiating a vote at [email protected] regarding the proposed consensus and encourage everyone to participate. All PPMC members must cast their votes, while committers are welcome to leave comments.
We can make sure all PPMC members presents their ideas on this consensus in this way. On Thu, Nov 30, 2023, at 15:06, tison wrote: >> But, currently, it seems rare they are going to say anything. >> I am curious, why? > > I agree that this is a concern that the PPMC is less active in the > graduation discussion and moving forward tasks. > > Best, > tison. > > Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2023年11月30日周四 14:46写道： >> >> I don't think we should follow lazy consensus for this very important thing. >> The whole thing of graduation is about making sure the PMC is taking >> over the oversight responsibilities from mentors. >> But, currently, it seems rare they are going to say anything. >> I am curious, why? >> >> Sheng Wu 吴晟 >> Twitter, wusheng1108 >> >> Xuanwo <[email protected]> 于2023年11月29日周三 22:40写道： >> > >> > > I'd resume this discussion. AFAICS, the lazy consensus for this topic >> > > among the PPMC is mapping the current PPMC members and committers >> > > structure to the graduated PMC members and committers structure. >> > >> > I'm ok with this. >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, at 09:15, tison wrote: >> > > I'd resume this discussion. AFAICS, the lazy consensus for this topic >> > > among the PPMC is mapping the current PPMC members and committers >> > > structure to the graduated PMC members and committers structure. >> > > >> > > This is doable and actually what Kvrocks does during its graduation. >> > > We can regard this round as a chance to review our >> > > contributors/committers and nominate them if desired. >> > > >> > > If this is the consensus, we can make an explicit agreement. >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > tison. >> > > >> > > Chojan Shang <[email protected]> 于2023年11月18日周六 21:16写道： >> > >> >> > >> I wholeheartedly endorse Xuanwo's perspective. >> > >> >> > >> Let's promote actively involved committers as PMC members, recognizing >> > >> their recent contributions. Instead of promoting committers solely >> > >> based on our transition to TLP, let's emphasize their increased >> > >> responsibilities and active involvement in project governance. This >> > >> approach aligns with our commitment to fostering a culture of >> > >> collaboration. >> > >> >> > >> This move marks an exciting milestone in our path towards becoming a >> > >> TLP. >> > >> >> > >> Best regards, >> > >> PsiACE >> > >> >> > >> On 2023/11/18 11:13:33 tison wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > Here is a sub-object on the project graduation - Have an agreement on >> > >> > the >> > >> > members of the PMC[1]. >> > >> > >> > >> > Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. >> > >> > All >> > >> > members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC. >> > >> > >> > >> > I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the >> > >> > TLP >> > >> > PMC unless there is a certain issue. >> > >> > >> > >> > And this thread is to reach a consensus on the proposal above. >> > >> > >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > tison. >> > >> > >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/issues/3616 >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Xuanwo -- Xuanwo
