> We can regard this round as a chance to review our > contributors/committers and nominate them if desired.
I agree with this point. > All members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC. Better to vote for the specific person to be the PMC member, not all of them. > I agree that this is a concern that the PPMC is less active in the > graduation discussion and moving forward tasks. Sorry for the less active in this thread, a little busy with work and a new baby. tison <[email protected]> 于2023年11月30日周四 15:06写道： > > But, currently, it seems rare they are going to say anything. > > I am curious, why? > > I agree that this is a concern that the PPMC is less active in the > graduation discussion and moving forward tasks. > > Best, > tison. > > Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2023年11月30日周四 14:46写道： > > > > I don't think we should follow lazy consensus for this very important > thing. > > The whole thing of graduation is about making sure the PMC is taking > > over the oversight responsibilities from mentors. > > But, currently, it seems rare they are going to say anything. > > I am curious, why? > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > Xuanwo <[email protected]> 于2023年11月29日周三 22:40写道： > > > > > > > I'd resume this discussion. AFAICS, the lazy consensus for this topic > > > > among the PPMC is mapping the current PPMC members and committers > > > > structure to the graduated PMC members and committers structure. > > > > > > I'm ok with this. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, at 09:15, tison wrote: > > > > I'd resume this discussion. AFAICS, the lazy consensus for this topic > > > > among the PPMC is mapping the current PPMC members and committers > > > > structure to the graduated PMC members and committers structure. > > > > > > > > This is doable and actually what Kvrocks does during its graduation. > > > > We can regard this round as a chance to review our > > > > contributors/committers and nominate them if desired. > > > > > > > > If this is the consensus, we can make an explicit agreement. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > tison. > > > > > > > > Chojan Shang <[email protected]> 于2023年11月18日周六 21:16写道： > > > >> > > > >> I wholeheartedly endorse Xuanwo's perspective. > > > >> > > > >> Let's promote actively involved committers as PMC members, > recognizing their recent contributions. Instead of promoting committers > solely based on our transition to TLP, let's emphasize their increased > responsibilities and active involvement in project governance. This > approach aligns with our commitment to fostering a culture of collaboration. > > > >> > > > >> This move marks an exciting milestone in our path towards becoming > a TLP. > > > >> > > > >> Best regards, > > > >> PsiACE > > > >> > > > >> On 2023/11/18 11:13:33 tison wrote: > > > >> > Hi, > > > >> > > > > >> > Here is a sub-object on the project graduation - Have an > agreement on the > > > >> > members of the PMC[1]. > > > >> > > > > >> > Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP > PMC. All > > > >> > members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC. > > > >> > > > > >> > I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in > the TLP > > > >> > PMC unless there is a certain issue. > > > >> > > > > >> > And this thread is to reach a consensus on the proposal above. > > > >> > > > > >> > Best, > > > >> > tison. > > > >> > > > > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/issues/3616 > > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > > Xuanwo >
