> I suggest initiating a vote at [email protected] regarding the proposed consensus and > encourage everyone to participate. > All PPMC members must cast their votes, while committers are welcome to leave > comments.
I think this could be a good way. Our current discussion has been going on for a relatively long time. We may need a clearer context for posting ideas to encourage active participation from all. Sincerely, Suyan Xuanwo <[email protected]> 于2023年11月30日周四 15:19写道： > > I suggest initiating a vote at [email protected] regarding the proposed consensus and > encourage everyone to participate. All PPMC members must cast their votes, > while committers are welcome to leave comments. > > We can make sure all PPMC members presents their ideas on this consensus in > this way. > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023, at 15:06, tison wrote: > >> But, currently, it seems rare they are going to say anything. > >> I am curious, why? > > > > I agree that this is a concern that the PPMC is less active in the > > graduation discussion and moving forward tasks. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2023年11月30日周四 14:46写道： > >> > >> I don't think we should follow lazy consensus for this very important > >> thing. > >> The whole thing of graduation is about making sure the PMC is taking > >> over the oversight responsibilities from mentors. > >> But, currently, it seems rare they are going to say anything. > >> I am curious, why? > >> > >> Sheng Wu 吴晟 > >> Twitter, wusheng1108 > >> > >> Xuanwo <[email protected]> 于2023年11月29日周三 22:40写道： > >> > > >> > > I'd resume this discussion. AFAICS, the lazy consensus for this topic > >> > > among the PPMC is mapping the current PPMC members and committers > >> > > structure to the graduated PMC members and committers structure. > >> > > >> > I'm ok with this. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023, at 09:15, tison wrote: > >> > > I'd resume this discussion. AFAICS, the lazy consensus for this topic > >> > > among the PPMC is mapping the current PPMC members and committers > >> > > structure to the graduated PMC members and committers structure. > >> > > > >> > > This is doable and actually what Kvrocks does during its graduation. > >> > > We can regard this round as a chance to review our > >> > > contributors/committers and nominate them if desired. > >> > > > >> > > If this is the consensus, we can make an explicit agreement. > >> > > > >> > > Best, > >> > > tison. > >> > > > >> > > Chojan Shang <[email protected]> 于2023年11月18日周六 21:16写道： > >> > >> > >> > >> I wholeheartedly endorse Xuanwo's perspective. > >> > >> > >> > >> Let's promote actively involved committers as PMC members, > >> > >> recognizing their recent contributions. Instead of promoting > >> > >> committers solely based on our transition to TLP, let's emphasize > >> > >> their increased responsibilities and active involvement in project > >> > >> governance. This approach aligns with our commitment to fostering a > >> > >> culture of collaboration. > >> > >> > >> > >> This move marks an exciting milestone in our path towards becoming a > >> > >> TLP. > >> > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> PsiACE > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2023/11/18 11:13:33 tison wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Here is a sub-object on the project graduation - Have an agreement > >> > >> > on the > >> > >> > members of the PMC[1]. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. > >> > >> > All > >> > >> > members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in > >> > >> > the TLP > >> > >> > PMC unless there is a certain issue. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > And this thread is to reach a consensus on the proposal above. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Best, > >> > >> > tison. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/issues/3616 > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Xuanwo > > -- > Xuanwo
