Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
do we have numbers how many 32bit downloads we have, I would assume that
Linux is running under 64bit mainly.
No, it isn't. 32-bit was still a clear winner for the whole 2013:
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/mediaresource/ee577c6b-74ca-472a-b698-b8488748e0dd
(as you see, 64-bit between 20 and 50% of the Linux downloads; it is
growing and reached 50% in December, but it will take a while before
32-bit becomes negligible).
I am in favor to drop 32 bit Linux to reduce the number of binary
builds. Any opinions?
The above already shows that we can't drop 64-bit now. Additionally, a
significant percentage of Linux installation probably starts from a
"live media" installation, and for maximum compatibility these are often
32-bit. So it may well happen that 64-bit capable hardware still runs a
32-bit distribution.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
