On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:18:34 +0100 > Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 1/13/14 6:39 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I have upload a new snapshot for Mac and Windows based on revision > > >> 1521921. I also update the related wiki page under [1] (quite painful > > >> after the confluence update). > > >> > > >> An overview of changes/fixes in this snapshot since AOO 4.0.1 can be > > >> found under [2]. > > >> > > >> Mac is still 32 bit but my plan is that the next snapshot and future > > >> versions will be 64 bit. > > >> > > >> Linux is not yet available via the snapshot page because of some > > >> problems with the build machines. I recommend the builds from the > Apache > > >> builds bots. The difference is only that the Apache bots have a newer > > >> baseline but will work on newer Linux systems. > > >> > > > > > > OK -- it looks like we're still only generating .deb packages for > 32-bit > > > Linux from SNAPSHOT, so 32 bit Linux folks must use nightly.. > > > > do we have numbers how many 32bit downloads we have, I would assume that > > Linux is running under 64bit mainly. > > > > I am in favor to drop 32 bit Linux to reduce the number of binary > > builds. Any opinions? But probably better in a new thread ;-) > > > > Juergen > > Many older computers will only run 32 bit Linux. This may not be common > among developers, but certainly is among older users and installers/linux > advocates who migrate older users to cast off machines from children. My > own main editing comouter is a 32 bit running Xubuntu and OpenOffice. If I > am asked to salvage a cast off computer I normally reformat the HD and put > 32 bit linux on it without further thought, as this will run on nearly > anything. I would regret the loss of OO 32 bit. > I also am on 32-bit Linux and I think others here may be as well. Yes, I do have an older computer but I'm happy with it for now. So, WAH!, on the idea of dropping the 32-bit binaries. On my original question/complaint. I could change the buildbot script to generate rpms (I think the 32 bit linux snapshot is only building for "deb", en-US currently), but probably this buildbot instance would then need to be restarted, which, I can't do. > > > > > > > > > > > > And...??? > > > > > > Looking at: > > > > > > http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ > > > > > > the revision numbers don't seem correct. Right now "/trunk" (used for > > > nightly) is at: 1557669 > > > and SNAPSHOT is at: 1556251 > > > > > > Maybe these need to be manually changes in the table? I don't know who > > > maintains the page above. > > > > > > > > >> I plan to provide patch sets for Windows in the next days together > with > > >> additional information how to test and use them. > > >> > > >> Further languages and updates of existing languages will be integrated > > >> in the next snapshot. > > >> > > >> Juergen > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason
