Am 12/03/2014 12:23 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:

On 12/02/2014 02:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

[...]

Since there are concerns that the power to decide what to reject can be
too subjective, I'm asking that we (subject to lazy consensus) agree
that "Quick Office Pro" posts can be rejected with the explanation note
described above. This will get irrelevant messages out of the list and
avoid dangerous misunderstandings: I've personally replied to several
such posts and I've seen other users get confused and believe that the
reports applied to OpenOffice instead of Quick Office Pro, thus leading
to even more confusion. A well-written rejection notice can be much more
effective.

[...]

+1 on this proposal. And...

In general +1. But I would like to see the complete text that should be used as general message when rejecting mails. @Andrea: Can you state this in a separate paragraph?

And it shouldn't be limited to users@ but should be used for all - also for dev@.

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to