On Sunday, April 5, 2015, jonathon <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote: > > > felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative and > against the wishes of the community > > I'm going to suggest that said PMC Member was simply shocked at the > radical difference in reporting styles.
Just to clarify, this did not come from a AOO PMC! It came from a ASF Member who read the board mailing list. No AOO PMC has at this point in time, written that I have acted against the interest of the community. > You (Jan) do not like negative surprises. Consequently, your reports > reflect that POV. > Andrea is more surprise-tolerant, and consequently reports reflect that > POV. > > Both reports are accurate. The difference is simply one of managerial > style --- mention potential risks, or only mention documented risks. > Both styles have their virtues. Both styles have their vices. The > people kicked upstairs can be traumatized by the difference in reporting > styles, during the transition process. Agreed, I will however, due to pressure, from non AOO PMC, change the report, and have a new discussion start on this mailing list. I have asked the people in question to come forward in here and explain their opinions. I apologize to the community, for not having realized that consensus in AOO, is not enough, when making a board report. rgds jan i > > > > jonathon > > * English - detected > * English > > * English > > <javascript:void(0);> > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
