Well, not sure if it is *allowed* or not, but VMware Fusion specifically
allows for it. And it works.

> On Sep 2, 2016, at 1:11 PM, Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> That's unfortunate.  And Apple doesn't allow running OSX under a VM on
> another
> OS do they?
> 
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
> 
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote:
> 
>> I looked at some of those services a few weeks ago. For the ones I
>> found, the relatively inexpensive options did not have the capability of
>> building software, let alone the capacity for build a substantial body
>> of software. The options with the capability and capacity would cost
>> more than a Mac Mini over a few months.
>> 
>> For example, for macincloud we would need the "Dedicated Server" plan
>> ($49+) with added "Optional Build Server Plan". Even their maximum
>> upgrade of 250 GB would not be enough for AOO building.
>> 
>> The conclusion I reached was that if I were going to do any Mac
>> development it would take less of my time and energy to buy one of the
>> more powerful Macs and manage it directly.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/2/2016 9:53 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>> 
>>> Sadly, I don't own a Mac.  I use one at work, but all of my personal
>>> hardware
>>> is PC based, running Linux.
>>> 
>>> I wonder if it would work to use something like this:
>>> 
>>> http://www.macincloud.com/
>>> 
>>> Anybody have any experience with something like that?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Phil
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:20 PM, toki <toki.kant...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 02/09/2016 14:59, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> What is the most important thing/things we could be working on?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On your own hardware:
>>>> 
>>>> Repeat:
>>>>   Build a Mac OS X Binary;
>>>>   Fix the error messages you get;
>>>>   Write notes about what you did;
>>>>   Test the program functionality;
>>>> Until it builds properly and all functions work as expected;
>>>> 
>>>> Then submit the patches and notes your you wrote to the SVN.
>>>> 
>>>> How do we counter the FUD that is already being promulgated in
>>>>> 
>>>> response to the "retirement" discussion?
>>>> 
>>>> At this stage, the only thing that might be adequate, is a release
>>>> before the end of the weekend, followed up by a release before New Years.
>>>> 
>>>> jonathon
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to