Hi - Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > > Am 10.10.2017 um 22:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> On Oct 10, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Now the question is, is it OK for us to go ahead, release 4.1.4 with this >>> "known issue" and commit to fixing this and other possible regressions in >>> 4.1.5 next month? Technically, the Release Manager (and I still consider >>> Jim to be in charge, of course!) has the last word. But I'd say everybody >>> is welcome to comment. >> I am 100% fine w/ this. It is a known regression however, but we can >> say that w/ the release of 4.1.4 we are committing ourselves to a 4.1.5 in >> 30-60 days. > > sounds good. We will need to make sure that people know how to get 4.1.3 if they run into the issue. > > Then we can still decide if the amount of issues is high enough to put effort > into a 4.1.5 release. Or move on to 4.2.0. How stable is trunk? Regards, Dave > > Marcus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
