Hi - If this is done then I would suggest that we include a feature to make use of a version of checker.apache.org <http://checker.apache.org/> to allow for testing to see that the package being installed is the one that came from the AOO community and not from a repackager.
Regards, Dave > On Feb 19, 2018, at 12:55 AM, FR web forum <ooofo...@free.fr> wrote: > > MSI feature will be great: > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123427 > Provide MSI package for easy deployment > > My 2 ct. too > > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "Peter Kovacs" <pe...@apache.org> >> À: "dev" <dev@openoffice.apache.org> >> Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Février 2018 22:13:58 >> Objet: Windows developent plan >> >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to bring up 2 future issues we will have. >> # Java : Soon Java 8 will run out of support. Do we need to "migrate" >> to >> 9 for 4.2.0? >> >> # If so it would mean for windows that we need to migrate to 64 bit. >> >> # The MSVC2008 will run out in April. We need to upgrade here too. >> >> In what order would make it sense to tackle those Issues? >> >> 1) 64 transformation >> 2) upgrade from MSVC2008 >> 3) upgrade code base to Java 9 >> >> ? >> >> We need to make a plan, any further thoughts? >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
