Hi -

If this is done then I would suggest that we include a feature to make use of a 
version of checker.apache.org <http://checker.apache.org/> to allow for testing 
to see that the package being installed is the one that came from the AOO 
community and not from a repackager.

Regards,
Dave

> On Feb 19, 2018, at 12:55 AM, FR web forum <ooofo...@free.fr> wrote:
> 
> MSI feature will be great:
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123427
> Provide MSI package for easy deployment
> 
> My 2 ct. too
> 
> 
> ----- Mail original -----
>> De: "Peter Kovacs" <pe...@apache.org>
>> À: "dev" <dev@openoffice.apache.org>
>> Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Février 2018 22:13:58
>> Objet: Windows developent plan
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I would like to bring up 2 future issues we will have.
>> # Java : Soon Java 8 will run out of support. Do we need to "migrate"
>> to
>> 9 for 4.2.0?
>> 
>> # If so it would mean for windows that we need to migrate to 64 bit.
>> 
>> # The MSVC2008 will run out in April. We need to upgrade here too.
>> 
>> In what order would make it sense to tackle those Issues?
>> 
>> 1) 64 transformation
>> 2) upgrade from MSVC2008
>> 3) upgrade code base to Java 9
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> We need to make a plan, any further thoughts?
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to