IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to always allow to look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are looking to build right now then 4.2.0dev.
Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0? All The Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > >> Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> >>>> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >>>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori <ard...@yahoo.it.INVALID> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0? >>>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-) >>>>> >>>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, >>>> but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense >>>> of 4.2.X. >>> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0. >>> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time. >>> >>> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent... >>> >>> Regards, >>> >> So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3? > > I don't see a problem to do both? > > Matthias > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
