Am 27.05.21 um 16:18 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 27.05.21 um 16:07 schrieb Dave Fisher:
IMO there are a couple more issues like hyperlink protocols to always allow to
look into before 4.1.11 builds. So, if you are looking to build right now then
4.2.0dev.
Yes, 4.2.0-Dev3 would simply be an official "snapshot" of what we have
in branch AOO42X.
4.1.11 needs a lot more work to be released.
Maybe a thread on the release blockers for 4.2.0?
+1
please not as mails. IMHO this will end in a total mess and nobody is
able to keep the overview. ;-)
Better to create a Confluence page, start with the list of opened and
targeted issues [1]. Then we can discuss which issues we can fix for 4.2.0.
[1]
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&resolution=---&target_milestone=4.2.0
Marcus
On May 27, 2021, at 6:41 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori <ard...@yahoo.it.INVALID> wrote:
I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0?
Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-)
FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, but I don't see
why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense of 4.2.X.
We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0.
But the remaining ones are untouched for long time.
What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent...
So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
I don't see a problem to do both?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
