Hi Jim, Am 27.05.21 um 15:38 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> On May 21, 2021, at 5:02 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 14.05.21 um 18:56 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>> On May 14, 2021, at 1:27 AM, Arrigo Marchiori <ard...@yahoo.it.INVALID> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I agree, but how many 4.1.X versions do we want to publish before 4.2.0? >>>> Now that we support two digits, please let us not point to 4.1.99 ! ;-) >>>> >>> FWIW, I tend to agree. We fixed the bug. Maybe its not the best solution, >>> but I don't see why we should continue to "focus" on 4.1.X at the expense >>> of 4.2.X. >> We already made some progress on the Release Blockers for 4.2.0. >> But the remaining ones are untouched for long time. >> >> What about a 4.2.0-Dev3? We already planned it when 4.1.10 got urgent... >> >> Regards, >> > So should the push be 4.1.11 or 4.2.0-Dev3?
I don't see a problem to do both? Matthias > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
