Hi Jim, all

Regarding your initial question I think it makes sense to move to 5.0 (with all 
the weight that a .0 version will carry). The changes are big enough to 
consider it a major new version.

I think that AOO is not in a position to discard the 32bit version under 
Windows suddenly (given the unknown stability of a brand new 64bit version). It 
would be better if AOO 5.0 is compatible with 32-bit Windows but if it is not 
possible, it will probably be a very marginal loss.

Best,
Pedro

> On 08/12/2026 1:52 PM WEST Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> One more question: What about 32 bit versions? Do we continue to support AOO 
> on Windows 32bit and Linux/FreeBSD 32bit?
> 
> BTW: It looks like FreeBSD 10.x is the oldest version which includes the 
> required c++11 toolset. I have no idea what our FreeBSD compatibility matrix 
> looks like for AOO 4.1.x.
> 
> > On Aug 10, 2026, at 10:21 AM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > I support AOO50X and that we emphasize modern OS and dependency support 
> > which drives a major version release.
> > 
> > We also should reconsider what should be the minimum supported OSs and 
> > underlying dependencies.
> > 
> > 1. macOS silicon, but what minimum version?
> > 2. 64 bit Windows, but what level of dev platform?
> > 3. Linux. Versions of RHEL and CENTOS?
> > 4. Python 3.10 or greater?
> > 5. Java JDK version minimum?
> > 6. What happens to FreeBSD and OS/2 downstreams?
> > 
> > Best,
> > Dave
> > 
> >> On Aug 10, 2026, at 6:10 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >> There's been some discussion regarding whether or not the version number 
> >> 4.2.x (or even 4.5.x) is "right" for the next major version we are looking 
> >> at. It's been suggested that maybe AOO42X be renamed to AOO50X and the 
> >> respective changes also be applied to trunk as well.
> >> 
> >> Comments?
> >> FWIW: I would support that effort.
> >> --
> >> Jim
> >> "This is an outrage!"
> >>                       Tony Harrison
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > 
> 
> --
> Jim
>   "This is an outrage!"
>                         Tony Harrison

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to