Thorsten Ziehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think the basic misunderstanding between our two camps (Sun people > > vs. OOo volunteers) is the fact that the typical workflow is simply > > radically different. > > > > That the workflow is different I see, but why it should be? > Why not? If this does not harm us, why limit other people's freedom?
> If the specification (documentation) is written before or after the > code is implemented in a CWS isn't important for me. But if you hand > over a CWS to other people or before you want to integrate new > feature (especially UI features) the specification (documentation) > must be in final state. > I'd avoid the wording 'final' here, and rather say it must be sufficient for the intended audience (QA and help). Which gives the intended audience the opportunity to demand enhancements, if they feel insufficiently educated. ;-) Cheers, -- Thorsten If you're not failing some of the time, you're not trying hard enough. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
