Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Stefan de Konink wrote: >> ...but again this trust was misplaced. No, it is not Potlatch 0.9a, >> it cannot be Potlatch is the perfect user tool and introduction to >> OSM. > > More to the point, 0.9a hasn't actually been in use for 349 days. So either > your checks have missed this before (it cannot be, they are the perfect user > checks etc. etc.), or it isn't Potlatch.
Exactly my point; it is not Potlatch! > *blam* > > /me needs another barrel True, but I am now implementing a *super duper* *top secret* *z-curve* OSM implementation, that just has problems with INT_MAX failures from OSM. So unless you feel responsible for sending -1 and someone else interpreters them as INT_MAX I am not blaming you, only myself for not explicitly checking my accepted input range. Not to worry, now I am just converting 100+GB worth of data again... Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
