On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Gregory Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at the data, it was modified on 2008-05-11. That was within the API > 0.5 timeframe. So surely it was the 0.5 -> 0.6 upgrade process that didn't > catch the data anomaly, rather than the current API 0.6 code? After all, the > data hasn't been changed since API 0.6 went live.
the migration didn't even check lat/lon - i hadn't considered the possibility that there was already duff data in the 0.5 db! richard had a very plausible explanation for how they got in though. we should definitely ban the editor which was used ;-) cheers, matt _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
