Stefan de Konink wrote: > ....but again this trust was misplaced. No, it is not Potlatch 0.9a, it > cannot be Potlatch is the perfect user tool and introduction to OSM. It > must be API 0.6 that didn't solve all our problems, as was promised. > Instead but it opened the gates of hell, a parallel universe within > OSM...[/melodramatic] [start fanfare tune + brass] > > http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/8115655/full > > http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/node/255483811/history > > > I probably have to blame myself; I was a fool to speed up my converter > by removing the consistency checks. But since when do we support more > than -180/+180 ?
My understanding is that there's nothing intrinsically tying us to ±90° by ±180°, based on the responses I got on #osm when asking about the possibility of mapping something with a geometry grossly different from Earth's (ie, Second Life). On Earth, at least, anything outside of the ±180x90° range is likely subject to standard trigonometry in terms of placement, assuming it's not rejected.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
