Matt Amos wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Gregory Williams > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Looking at the data, it was modified on 2008-05-11. That was within the API >> 0.5 timeframe. So surely it was the 0.5 -> 0.6 upgrade process that didn't >> catch the data anomaly, rather than the current API 0.6 code? After all, the >> data hasn't been changed since API 0.6 went live. > > the migration didn't even check lat/lon - i hadn't considered the > possibility that there was already duff data in the 0.5 db!
I did a count earlier on and there are a couple of hundred with one or both coordinates out of bounds. Some of those might be deleted though as I didn't check the visible flag. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://www.compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
