On 07/05/11 14:33, Mikel Maron wrote:

* "big" changesets are no longer marked, but that was useful. Want to
find some non-obtrusive way of visually distinguishing them.
* would be nice to do a similar same thing with bots. Is there a bot
flag in the db?

The correct solution to this is to sort out OWL integration. I have previously refused patches to do other heuristics and I see no reason to change that policy.

* Need to set a minimum height on the map.

Fixed by me yesterday.

* The real way to deal with big and bot changesets is to have this
listing driving by OWL. What's needed to make that happen?

We need to sort out hardware so we can move it to a proper production status. We had a machine but it turned out not to have enough disk and now it has been temporarily borrowed for something else.

* How could we incorporate more visualization tools directly, like
ITOMapper?

This has to be subject to the usual caveats about not relying on external services on the main site.

Tom

--
Tom Hughes ([email protected])
http://compton.nu/

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to