On 07/05/11 16:12, Mikel Maron wrote:
In this case, we're just talking about if this is a good usability feature, or not. To me it's good, was good, and now it's less usable in a way than before.
I have never found any use for the big changeset indication that was there before, other than to make me depressed when I click on history for a random area and find, invariably, that 19 of the 20 edits listed are shown as big.
I don't see how you can argue that it's a bad usability feature to visually distinguish big/bot/friend edits.
I have no objection to distinguishing friend edits, or bot edits (if we had a way to know which they were, which we don't).
I don't see the point of distinguishing "big" edits because people don't really care - the only thing they really case about is whether the edit touches a given area. Big is simply a (poor) proxy for that.
Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
