On 07/05/11 16:39, Ian Dees wrote:
It appears that OWL is the way forward then. Will you allow patches that use OWL's API to request history or will that fall under "no external services"? Presumably when OWL gets real hardware it will be a different machine but on the same network.
There's no reason somebody couldn't work on such patches. I'm a bit reluctant to consider merging them before we have it production hardware but I might be persuaded. It certainly wouldn't hurt to have the patch ready though.
Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
