On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Mikel Maron <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have refused to apply patches which do that, because I want somebody to >> fix it properly and I am trying to incentivise people to do so. > > Tom, you're talking about integrating OWL, yes? And in principle, that's the > best solution ... but it's been over a year that I've heard that, and I just > want to improve things now, in a way I possibly can.
Even if OWL gets integrated I think Mikels solution would still be better for many changesets (and vice versa). Considering that OWL in its current form isn't designed to visualize lots of changesets, this clearly isn't only about big changesets. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
