On 07/05/11 19:58, Erik Johansson wrote:
Even if OWL gets integrated I think Mikels solution would still be better for many changesets (and vice versa). Considering that OWL in its current form isn't designed to visualize lots of changesets, this clearly isn't only about big changesets.
I think you misunderstand - we are talking about using OWL's ability to identify changesets which touch an area to drive the current website UI not about using the current OWL UI.
Tom -- Tom Hughes ([email protected]) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
