> I have never found any use for the big changeset indication that was there >before, other than to make me depressed when I click on history for a random >area and find, invariably, that 19 of the 20 edits listed are shown as big. It's useful to quick find the one that isn't big! > I have no objection to distinguishing friend edits, or bot edits (if we had a >way to know which they were, which we don't). Cool. bot=yes tag on the changeset is a good first step. > I don't see the point of distinguishing "big" edits because people don't > really >care - the only thing they really case about is whether the edit touches a >given >area. Big is simply a (poor) proxy for that. I disagree strongly. I think people really do care, enough that any proxy is good for the moment ... what percentage of big edits cover any particular area? -Mikel
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
