Yes, the @Inject-TCK runs with profile jsr330-tck

Btw.: It are the changes in AnnotatedTypeImpl#isOverridden that break it.
Do you take a look at it or shall I?

Am 30.06.14 07:12 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter
<[email protected]>:


>Is there another profile?
>
>
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>2014-06-30 7:10 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>:
>> And countingÅ 
>>
>> But we broke the @Inject-TCK :(
>> It was the commit for OWB-979 (R1606380)
>> I see, what I can do about it.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Arne
>>
>>
>> Am 29.06.14 21:59 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <[email protected]>:
>>
>>>we are now down to 38 failing tests.
>>>
>>>Txs Romain and Arne!
>>>
>>>gn8 and LIeGrue,
>>>strub
>>>
>>>
>>>On Saturday, 28 June 2014, 12:18, Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>This has to do how surefire counts such tests.
>>>>
>>>>If you run them in the IDE you will see the correct stats.
>>>>
>>>>Running single unit tests in Idea I always use a little debug-suite.xml
>>>>which I configure for the testng runner:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----
>>>><suite name="JSR-346-TCK debug" verbose="2"
>>>>configfailurepolicy="continue">
>>>>    <test name="JSR-346 TCK debug">
>>>>        <groups>
>>>>            <run>
>>>>                <exclude name="integration" />
>>>>                <exclude name="javaee-full" />
>>>>            </run>
>>>>        </groups>
>>>>
>>>>        <packages>
>>>>            <!--
>>>>            <package name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.*">
>>>>                <include
>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.alterable"/>
>>>>                <include
>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.definition"
>>>>/>
>>>>                <include
>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definition
>>>>.b
>>>>roken.unresolvedMethod"/>
>>>>                <include
>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definition
>>>>.b
>>>>roken.validation.ambiguous"/>
>>>>                <include
>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definition
>>>>.b
>>>>roken.interceptor"/>
>>>>            </package>
>>>>            -->
>>>>        </packages>
>>>>
>>>>        <classes>
>>>>            <class
>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.alterable.AlterableContextTest">
>>>><!--
>>>>                <methods>
>>>>                    <include
>>>>name="testNothingHappensIfNoInstanceToDestroy"/>
>>>>                </methods>
>>>>-->
>>>>            </class>
>>>>        </classes>
>>>>    </test>
>>>>
>>>></suite>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----
>>>>
>>>>LieGrue,
>>>>strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, 28 June 2014, 11:56, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> > Hi Mark
>>>>>
>>>>> I have:
>>>>>
>>>>> Tests run: 1167, Failures: 158, Errors: 0, Skipped: 250
>>>>>
>>>>> What do I miss?
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW I should get few cycle to help tonight (or this afternoon)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-06-28 10:27 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  current state after yesterday nights hacking: we are at just 66
>>>>>>broken TCK
>>>>>>  tests left from almost 1000.
>>>>>>  C'm on guys, could need some help!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  LieGrue,
>>>>>>  strub
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  > On Saturday, 7 June 2014, 7:56, Mark Struberg
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>  > > Hi!
>>>>>>  >
>>>>>>  > I've upgraded trunk to the latest CDI-1.2 TCK test and did all
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>  necessary
>>>>>>  > configuration.
>>>>>>  >
>>>>>>  > I started with passing 134 tests and am not at 732. Still a few
>>>>>>miles
>>>>> to
>>>>>>  go
>>>>>>  > though...
>>>>>>  >
>>>>>>  > LieGrue,
>>>>>>  > strub
>>>>>>  >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to