CDI 1.1 wants parents methods with different qualifiers in at.getMethods() IIRC.
Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-06-30 7:25 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>: > @Inject does not have a new version for now (and probably will never have). > > You implemented isOverridden such that it returns true only if all > annotations of sub- and super-method are the same (excluding lifecycle- > and interceptor-methods). What was the reason behind that? In the > @Inject-TCK methods are overridden to remove qualifiers, which is now > broken. > > Am 30.06.14 07:19 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter > <[email protected]>: > > >>well not sure I can before tonight. BTW new tcks replaces older no? >>Know in bval they broke the tcks but that is intended >> >> >>Romain Manni-Bucau >>Twitter: @rmannibucau >>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >>2014-06-30 7:17 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>: >>> Yes, the @Inject-TCK runs with profile jsr330-tck >>> >>> Btw.: It are the changes in AnnotatedTypeImpl#isOverridden that break >>>it. >>> Do you take a look at it or shall I? >>> >>> Am 30.06.14 07:12 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter >>> <[email protected]>: >>> >>> >>>>Is there another profile? >>>> >>>> >>>>Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>> >>>> >>>>2014-06-30 7:10 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>: >>>>> And countingŠ >>>>> >>>>> But we broke the @Inject-TCK :( >>>>> It was the commit for OWB-979 (R1606380) >>>>> I see, what I can do about it. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Arne >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 29.06.14 21:59 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>>we are now down to 38 failing tests. >>>>>> >>>>>>Txs Romain and Arne! >>>>>> >>>>>>gn8 and LIeGrue, >>>>>>strub >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On Saturday, 28 June 2014, 12:18, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This has to do how surefire counts such tests. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If you run them in the IDE you will see the correct stats. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Running single unit tests in Idea I always use a little >>>>>>>debug-suite.xml >>>>>>>which I configure for the testng runner: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>---- >>>>>>><suite name="JSR-346-TCK debug" verbose="2" >>>>>>>configfailurepolicy="continue"> >>>>>>> <test name="JSR-346 TCK debug"> >>>>>>> <groups> >>>>>>> <run> >>>>>>> <exclude name="integration" /> >>>>>>> <exclude name="javaee-full" /> >>>>>>> </run> >>>>>>> </groups> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <packages> >>>>>>> <!-- >>>>>>> <package name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.*"> >>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.alterable"/> >>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.definitio >>>>>>>n" >>>>>>>/> >>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definiti >>>>>>>on >>>>>>>.b >>>>>>>roken.unresolvedMethod"/> >>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definiti >>>>>>>on >>>>>>>.b >>>>>>>roken.validation.ambiguous"/> >>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definiti >>>>>>>on >>>>>>>.b >>>>>>>roken.interceptor"/> >>>>>>> </package> >>>>>>> --> >>>>>>> </packages> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <classes> >>>>>>> <class >>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.alterable.AlterableContextTest" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>><!-- >>>>>>> <methods> >>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>name="testNothingHappensIfNoInstanceToDestroy"/> >>>>>>> </methods> >>>>>>>--> >>>>>>> </class> >>>>>>> </classes> >>>>>>> </test> >>>>>>> >>>>>>></suite> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>---- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>LieGrue, >>>>>>>strub >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Saturday, 28 June 2014, 11:56, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>><[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> > Hi Mark >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tests run: 1167, Failures: 158, Errors: 0, Skipped: 250 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do I miss? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW I should get few cycle to help tonight (or this afternoon) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2014-06-28 10:27 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> current state after yesterday nights hacking: we are at just 66 >>>>>>>>>broken TCK >>>>>>>>> tests left from almost 1000. >>>>>>>>> C'm on guys, could need some help! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> > On Saturday, 7 June 2014, 7:56, Mark Struberg >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > > Hi! >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > I've upgraded trunk to the latest CDI-1.2 TCK test and did all >>>>>>>>>the >>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>> > configuration. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > I started with passing 134 tests and am not at 732. Still a few >>>>>>>>>miles >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> go >>>>>>>>> > though... >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > LieGrue, >>>>>>>>> > strub >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> >
