test org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.extensions.beanManager.beanAttributes.CreateBeanAttributesTest if it can help
Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-06-30 7:36 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > CDI 1.1 wants parents methods with different qualifiers in at.getMethods() > IIRC. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-06-30 7:25 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>: >> @Inject does not have a new version for now (and probably will never have). >> >> You implemented isOverridden such that it returns true only if all >> annotations of sub- and super-method are the same (excluding lifecycle- >> and interceptor-methods). What was the reason behind that? In the >> @Inject-TCK methods are overridden to remove qualifiers, which is now >> broken. >> >> Am 30.06.14 07:19 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter >> <[email protected]>: >> >> >>>well not sure I can before tonight. BTW new tcks replaces older no? >>>Know in bval they broke the tcks but that is intended >>> >>> >>>Romain Manni-Bucau >>>Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>> >>>2014-06-30 7:17 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>: >>>> Yes, the @Inject-TCK runs with profile jsr330-tck >>>> >>>> Btw.: It are the changes in AnnotatedTypeImpl#isOverridden that break >>>>it. >>>> Do you take a look at it or shall I? >>>> >>>> Am 30.06.14 07:12 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter >>>> <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Is there another profile? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>>>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>>>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>>>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>2014-06-30 7:10 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>: >>>>>> And countingŠ >>>>>> >>>>>> But we broke the @Inject-TCK :( >>>>>> It was the commit for OWB-979 (R1606380) >>>>>> I see, what I can do about it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Arne >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 29.06.14 21:59 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>>we are now down to 38 failing tests. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Txs Romain and Arne! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>gn8 and LIeGrue, >>>>>>>strub >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>On Saturday, 28 June 2014, 12:18, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>This has to do how surefire counts such tests. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>If you run them in the IDE you will see the correct stats. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Running single unit tests in Idea I always use a little >>>>>>>>debug-suite.xml >>>>>>>>which I configure for the testng runner: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>---- >>>>>>>><suite name="JSR-346-TCK debug" verbose="2" >>>>>>>>configfailurepolicy="continue"> >>>>>>>> <test name="JSR-346 TCK debug"> >>>>>>>> <groups> >>>>>>>> <run> >>>>>>>> <exclude name="integration" /> >>>>>>>> <exclude name="javaee-full" /> >>>>>>>> </run> >>>>>>>> </groups> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <packages> >>>>>>>> <!-- >>>>>>>> <package name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.*"> >>>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.alterable"/> >>>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.producer.field.definitio >>>>>>>>n" >>>>>>>>/> >>>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definiti >>>>>>>>on >>>>>>>>.b >>>>>>>>roken.unresolvedMethod"/> >>>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definiti >>>>>>>>on >>>>>>>>.b >>>>>>>>roken.validation.ambiguous"/> >>>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.implementation.disposal.method.definiti >>>>>>>>on >>>>>>>>.b >>>>>>>>roken.interceptor"/> >>>>>>>> </package> >>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>> </packages> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <classes> >>>>>>>> <class >>>>>>>>name="org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.alterable.AlterableContextTest" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><!-- >>>>>>>> <methods> >>>>>>>> <include >>>>>>>>name="testNothingHappensIfNoInstanceToDestroy"/> >>>>>>>> </methods> >>>>>>>>--> >>>>>>>> </class> >>>>>>>> </classes> >>>>>>>> </test> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>></suite> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>---- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>LieGrue, >>>>>>>>strub >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, 28 June 2014, 11:56, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>><[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > Hi Mark >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tests run: 1167, Failures: 158, Errors: 0, Skipped: 250 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What do I miss? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BTW I should get few cycle to help tonight (or this afternoon) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>>>>>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2014-06-28 10:27 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> current state after yesterday nights hacking: we are at just 66 >>>>>>>>>>broken TCK >>>>>>>>>> tests left from almost 1000. >>>>>>>>>> C'm on guys, could need some help! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> > On Saturday, 7 June 2014, 7:56, Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> > > Hi! >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > I've upgraded trunk to the latest CDI-1.2 TCK test and did all >>>>>>>>>>the >>>>>>>>>> necessary >>>>>>>>>> > configuration. >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > I started with passing 134 tests and am not at 732. Still a few >>>>>>>>>>miles >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> go >>>>>>>>>> > though... >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>> > strub >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
