Hmm, read the spec twice and I am afraid, our understanding was wrong. In
11.4 it says that every method of every super type should be returned.
Since we rely on AnnotatedType#getMethod to return only relevant ones,
this is a bigger rework :(
I’ll take it and see, what I can do.

Cheers,
Arne


Am 30.06.14 09:13 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter
<[email protected]>:

>If you are on it please do otherwise I'll check tonight.
>
>
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>2014-06-30 9:07 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>:
>> As Mark says, this is NOT defined anywhere in the spec.
>> I guess, this is a weld issue since they don¹t handle inheritance in
>> AnnotatedTypes correctly.
>>
>> So, who creates a CDITCK ticket for it?
>>
>> Am 30.06.14 08:37 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter
>> <[email protected]>:
>>
>>
>>>basically
>>>http://grepcode.com/file/repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories
>>>/r
>>>eleases/org.jboss.cdi.tck/cdi-tck-impl/1.2.0.Beta1/org/jboss/cdi/tck/tes
>>>ts
>>>/extensions/beanManager/beanAttributes/Dam.java?av=f
>>>and
>>>http://grepcode.com/file/repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories
>>>/r
>>>eleases/org.jboss.cdi.tck/cdi-tck-impl/1.2.0.Beta1/org/jboss/cdi/tck/tes
>>>ts
>>>/extensions/beanManager/beanAttributes/Lake.java?av=f
>>>but
>>>http://grepcode.com/file/repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories
>>>/r
>>>eleases/org.jboss.cdi.tck/cdi-tck-impl/1.2.0.Beta1/org/jboss/cdi/tck/tes
>>>ts
>>>/extensions/beanManager/beanAttributes/CreateBeanAttributesTest.java#Cre
>>>at
>>>eBeanAttributesTest.testBeanAttributesForMethod%28%29
>>>expects to get both getFish methods
>>>
>>>
>>>Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>>2014-06-30 8:12 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:
>>>> CDI-1.1 does not require this. If the TCK tests this, then the test
>>>>needs to be challenged.
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, 30 June 2014, 7:44, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>CDI 1.1 wants parents methods with different qualifiers in
>>>>>at.getMethods() IIRC.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>>>>>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>>>>>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>>>>>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>2014-06-30 7:25 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg
>>>>><[email protected]>:
>>>>>> @Inject does not have a new version for now (and probably will never
>>>>>>have)
>>>>>
>>

Reply via email to