As Mark says, this is NOT defined anywhere in the spec. I guess, this is a weld issue since they don¹t handle inheritance in AnnotatedTypes correctly.
So, who creates a CDITCK ticket for it? Am 30.06.14 08:37 schrieb "Romain Manni-Bucau" unter <[email protected]>: >basically >http://grepcode.com/file/repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/r >eleases/org.jboss.cdi.tck/cdi-tck-impl/1.2.0.Beta1/org/jboss/cdi/tck/tests >/extensions/beanManager/beanAttributes/Dam.java?av=f >and >http://grepcode.com/file/repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/r >eleases/org.jboss.cdi.tck/cdi-tck-impl/1.2.0.Beta1/org/jboss/cdi/tck/tests >/extensions/beanManager/beanAttributes/Lake.java?av=f >but >http://grepcode.com/file/repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/repositories/r >eleases/org.jboss.cdi.tck/cdi-tck-impl/1.2.0.Beta1/org/jboss/cdi/tck/tests >/extensions/beanManager/beanAttributes/CreateBeanAttributesTest.java#Creat >eBeanAttributesTest.testBeanAttributesForMethod%28%29 >expects to get both getFish methods > > >Romain Manni-Bucau >Twitter: @rmannibucau >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >2014-06-30 8:12 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: >> CDI-1.1 does not require this. If the TCK tests this, then the test >>needs to be challenged. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> On Monday, 30 June 2014, 7:44, Romain Manni-Bucau >><[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >>>CDI 1.1 wants parents methods with different qualifiers in >>>at.getMethods() IIRC. >>> >>> >>>Romain Manni-Bucau >>>Twitter: @rmannibucau >>>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >>> >>> >>> >>>2014-06-30 7:25 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <[email protected]>: >>>> @Inject does not have a new version for now (and probably will never >>>>have) >>>
