geronimo@ who? I emailed the OWB list as the OWB team is maintaining the JAR, there's just considerable overlap w/ the geronimo PMC that it becomes confusing.
What about my comments about the javadocs? John On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:24 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi John, > > -> geronimo@ ;) > > Otherwise +1 for jenkins and to replace current 2.0 by an up to date > version > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-07-03 15:10 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > > > Hey guys > > > > I'm looking at the current state of the Geronimo CDI 2 spec jar. I'm > > wondering, what version of CDI 2 is it based on currently? > > > > In addition, I'm planning to apply patches to it based on the changes in > > CDI 2. I notice that unlike most geronimo specs, its pretty heavy on > > javadocs. I plan to restate them, similar to what i'm seeing in here. > > > > I'm wondering if we can enable a build in jenkins to build the JAR? > > > > John > > >
