cool guys! +1 daniel, the patch looks good
2016-07-11 21:51 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha <[email protected]>: > Cool! > > I have a patch to update maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin. > I had work on some changes on branch cdi-2.0 and I get some problems with > java8. > > It's necessary update this plugins to have build working fine, so I'll be > possible to use java8 features on the code. :) > > Let me see what do you think about it: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134 > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected] > > > wrote: > > > txs will apply. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, 11 July 2016, 2:43, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > I've raised a JIRA with the API changes that I noticed. There might > > be a > > > few more pending. I tested it against Weld, apparently they're behind > a > > > little bit as well. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 > > > > > > - John > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:46 PM Mark Struberg <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > Only constraint we > > >> > have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK. > > >> > > >> Except we wrote that stuff ourselves for the spec. In that case the > > >> original author is of course free to also contribute it to the ASF > > under > > >> ALv2. > > >> > > >> LieGrue, > > >> strub > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Am 03.07.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > > > <[email protected] > > >> >: > > >> > > > >> > Le 3 juil. 2016 22:56, "John D. Ament" > > > <[email protected]> a écrit : > > >> >> > > >> >> geronimo@ who? > > >> > > > >> > Dev list > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> I emailed the OWB list as the OWB team is maintaining the JAR, > > > there's > > >> > just > > >> >> considerable overlap w/ the geronimo PMC that it becomes > > > confusing. > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > Well you can also see geronimo community is doing so since people > > >> overlap a > > >> > lot there but strictly speaking this jar is not always driven by > owb. > > >> > > > >> >> What about my comments about the javadocs? > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > It is usually best effort but im +1 to make it better. Only > > constraint > > > we > > >> > have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK. > > >> > > > >> >> John > > >> >> > > >> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:24 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> Hi John, > > >> >>> > > >> >>> -> geronimo@ ;) > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Otherwise +1 for jenkins and to replace current 2.0 by an up > > > to date > > >> >>> version > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >> >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress > > > Blog > > >> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > >> >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > > > Tomitriber > > >> >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > >> >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> 2016-07-03 15:10 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament > > > <[email protected]>: > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> Hey guys > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> I'm looking at the current state of the Geronimo CDI 2 > > > spec jar. I'm > > >> >>>> wondering, what version of CDI 2 is it based on currently? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> In addition, I'm planning to apply patches to it based > > > on the changes > > >> > in > > >> >>>> CDI 2. I notice that unlike most geronimo specs, its > > > pretty heavy on > > >> >>>> javadocs. I plan to restate them, similar to what i'm > > > seeing in here. > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> I'm wondering if we can enable a build in jenkins to > > > build the JAR? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> John > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Daniel Cunha > https://twitter.com/dvlc_ > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://www.tomitribe.io >
