Le 3 juil. 2016 22:56, "John D. Ament" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > geronimo@ who?
Dev list > > I emailed the OWB list as the OWB team is maintaining the JAR, there's just > considerable overlap w/ the geronimo PMC that it becomes confusing. > Well you can also see geronimo community is doing so since people overlap a lot there but strictly speaking this jar is not always driven by owb. > What about my comments about the javadocs? > It is usually best effort but im +1 to make it better. Only constraint we have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK. > John > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:24 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > -> geronimo@ ;) > > > > Otherwise +1 for jenkins and to replace current 2.0 by an up to date > > version > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > 2016-07-03 15:10 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hey guys > > > > > > I'm looking at the current state of the Geronimo CDI 2 spec jar. I'm > > > wondering, what version of CDI 2 is it based on currently? > > > > > > In addition, I'm planning to apply patches to it based on the changes in > > > CDI 2. I notice that unlike most geronimo specs, its pretty heavy on > > > javadocs. I plan to restate them, similar to what i'm seeing in here. > > > > > > I'm wondering if we can enable a build in jenkins to build the JAR? > > > > > > John > > > > >
