Yep, thats all necessary.  Once thats in, cdi spec jar should be buildable.

John

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:54 PM Thomas Andraschko <
[email protected]> wrote:

> cool guys!
>
> +1 daniel, the patch looks good
>
> 2016-07-11 21:51 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha <[email protected]>:
>
> > Cool!
> >
> > I have a patch to update maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin.
> > I had work on some changes on branch cdi-2.0 and I get some problems with
> > java8.
> >
> > It's necessary update this plugins to have build working fine, so I'll be
> > possible to use java8 features on the code. :)
> >
> > Let me see what do you think about it:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Mark Struberg
> <[email protected]
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > txs will apply.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Monday, 11 July 2016, 2:43, John D. Ament <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I've raised a JIRA with the API changes that I noticed.  There
> might
> > > be a
> > > > few more pending.  I tested it against Weld, apparently they're
> behind
> > a
> > > > little bit as well.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553
> > > >
> > > > - John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:46 PM Mark Struberg
> <[email protected]
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>  >  Only constraint we
> > > >>  > have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK.
> > > >>
> > > >>  Except we wrote that stuff ourselves for the spec. In that case the
> > > >>  original author is of course free to also contribute it to the ASF
> > > under
> > > >>  ALv2.
> > > >>
> > > >>  LieGrue,
> > > >>  strub
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>  > Am 03.07.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > <[email protected]
> > > >>  >:
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  > Le 3 juil. 2016 22:56, "John D. Ament"
> > > > <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >> geronimo@ who?
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  > Dev list
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >> I emailed the OWB list as the OWB team is maintaining the JAR,
> > > > there's
> > > >>  > just
> > > >>  >> considerable overlap w/ the geronimo PMC that it becomes
> > > > confusing.
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  > Well you can also see geronimo community is doing so since people
> > > >>  overlap a
> > > >>  > lot there but strictly speaking this jar is not always driven by
> > owb.
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  >> What about my comments about the javadocs?
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  > It is usually best effort but im +1 to make it better. Only
> > > constraint
> > > > we
> > > >>  > have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK.
> > > >>  >
> > > >>  >> John
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:24 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > >>  [email protected]>
> > > >>  >> wrote:
> > > >>  >>
> > > >>  >>> Hi John,
> > > >>  >>>
> > > >>  >>> -> geronimo@ ;)
> > > >>  >>>
> > > >>  >>> Otherwise +1 for jenkins and to replace current 2.0 by an up
> > > > to date
> > > >>  >>> version
> > > >>  >>>
> > > >>  >>>
> > > >>  >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > >>  >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > >>  >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress
> > > > Blog
> > > >>  >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > >>  >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > >>  >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > > > Tomitriber
> > > >>  >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> > > >>  >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > >>  >>>
> > > >>  >>> 2016-07-03 15:10 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament
> > > > <[email protected]>:
> > > >>  >>>
> > > >>  >>>> Hey guys
> > > >>  >>>>
> > > >>  >>>> I'm looking at the current state of the Geronimo CDI 2
> > > > spec jar.  I'm
> > > >>  >>>> wondering, what version of CDI 2 is it based on currently?
> > > >>  >>>>
> > > >>  >>>> In addition, I'm planning to apply patches to it based
> > > > on the changes
> > > >>  > in
> > > >>  >>>> CDI 2.  I notice that unlike most geronimo specs, its
> > > > pretty heavy on
> > > >>  >>>> javadocs.  I plan to restate them, similar to what i'm
> > > > seeing in here.
> > > >>  >>>>
> > > >>  >>>> I'm wondering if we can enable a build in jenkins to
> > > > build the JAR?
> > > >>  >>>>
> > > >>  >>>> John
> > > >>  >>>>
> > > >>  >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Cunha
> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > http://www.tomitribe.io
> >
>

Reply via email to