Oh, and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3676
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote: > Some more info is available here, for the Cassandra project: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4254 > https://github.com/apache/cassandra > http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/HowToContribute > > I have a proposal to make... since we're not yet up for this, but do agree > that it is the future: what if we move Piggybank to github? > > We can do this at the hackathon we're having at Twitter - I forgot the > date? > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com>wrote: > >> Git was built with use case #1 being Linux developers exchanging patches >> as text via e-mail. I am not sure what binary patch support Linus plans >> or what it would help other than being more compact. One disadvantage is >> that it is then hard to review simple changes by simply reading the patch >> itself in a text editor. I have +1'd many near-trivial changes after only >> glancing at the text of the patch. >> >> SVN is (slowly) catching up to have better patch features. 'svn patch' is >> now in 1.7, 1.8 will enhance it, and eventually there is planned support >> for git patch extensions. In the long run the differences between the >> tools for day-to-day work will shrink from where it is now. Subversion is >> planning 'svn shelve' to make it more git-like when working locally, for >> example. >> >> On 3/27/12 10:43 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Could you enumerate the problems you have with text patches? >> > >> >I can think of 1, but would like to hear your list. >> > >> >Dmitriy >> > >> >On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Russell Jurney >> ><russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Using text patches is the problem as I see it. We should be using... >> >> something else. Doesn't git's functionality enable phasing out text >> >> patches? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Scott Carey >> >><sc...@richrelevance.com>wrote: >> >> >> >>> On the Avro project, several folk generate a patch using git and >> upload >> >>> that to the JIRA, it patches fine using unix 'patch'. >> >>> Why do you need to switch to svn to generate the patch? >> >>> >> >>> A committer needs to apply the patch to a location checked out with >> >>>svn, >> >>> but that is trivial. >> >>> >> >>> On 3/27/12 2:26 AM, "Gianmarco De Francisci Morales" <g...@apache.org >> > >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >My 2 cents, based on the S4 project experience so far (they have git) >> >>>is >> >>> >+1 >> >>> >but later. >> >>> > >> >>> >The process with git is still a bit fuzzy and not fully integrated >> and >> >>> >standardized like the one with svn. >> >>> >I personally use git for all my dev work with Pig, but then switch to >> >>>svn >> >>> >to generate the final patch. A bit cumbersome but not so bad. >> >>> > >> >>> >Switching now will generate confusion and is not that urgent in my >> >>>humble >> >>> >opinion. >> >>> > >> >>> >Cheers, >> >>> >-- >> >>> >Gianmarco >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:27, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> >> >>>wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> There is a check box you check when you upload a patch. If we >> >>>committed >> >>> >> without verifying you checked it, thats an unfortunate oversight. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> No, you cant send a pull request via github to apache. That's a >> >>>github >> >>> >> (commercial entity) feature, not a git (open source vcs) feature. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Yes you can post a link on a Jira and ask people for review prior >> to >> >>> >> submitting a formal patch. No that's not review board or Jira >> >>> >>integration. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Russell Jurney >> >>><russell.jur...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > That is fine. Only committers can merge pull requests. Not a >> >>> >>problem. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > I've never signed anything, and committers take my patches. >> >>>Works the >> >>> >> same. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Carey >> >>><sc...@richrelevance.com >> >>> >> >wrote: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> There is a legal issue as well. Uploading a patch to JIRA >> >>>requires >> >>> >>the >> >>> >> >> user to grant apache license to use the code. A pull request >> >>>from >> >>> >> github >> >>> >> >> does not. >> >>> >> >> This is all being hashed out elsewhere, none of us here are >> >>>experts. >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> On 3/22/12 2:08 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jur...@gmail.com> >> >>> >>wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> If there is already a trial going, the project would benefit >> >>>from >> >>> >> >>> switching >> >>> >> >>> to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull requests on >> >>>github. >> >>> >> Maybe >> >>> >> >>> not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits. Barrier >> >>>of >> >>> >>entry >> >>> >> >>> for >> >>> >> >>> contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy for >> all. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai >> >>><da...@hortonworks.com> >> >>> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>> This can be done in the future but I don't see there is an >> >>>urgent >> >>> >>need >> >>> >> >>>> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize the >> process >> >>> >>and we >> >>> >> >>>> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the first >> >>>several >> >>> >>to >> >>> >> >>>> try and solve the infrastructure problem. >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> Daniel >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney < >> >>> >> jcove...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> If people don't know git or svn, they are going to have to >> >>>learn >> >>> >>one >> >>> >> >>>> or >> >>> >> >>>> the >> >>> >> >>>>> other if they want to work with open source projects. It >> >>>might as >> >>> >> >>>> well be >> >>> >> >>>>> git, since that's where things are going. >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the primary >> >>>repo >> >>> >>using >> >>> >> >>>> the >> >>> >> >>>>>> CouchDB project. Other projects may be able to volunteer to >> >>>join >> >>> >> the >> >>> >> >>>>>> trial, I'm not sure. >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> I suggest that if you are interested in this join the apache >> >>> >> >>>>>> infrastructure-dev list. >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney" >> >>><russell.jur...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> What's the work? >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy >> >>><dvrya...@gmail.com >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do the >> work. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney < >> >>> >> >>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> What do we have to do to be the first real project that >> >>>uses >> >>> >>git? >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> It will propel the project forward. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> twitter.com/rjurney >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham >> >>> >><billgra...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire discussion >> >>>tree >> >>> >> >>>> that >> >>> >> >>>> we >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> had >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some incubator >> >>>projects >> >>> >> >>>> were >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> using >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> git. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880 >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed. Looking >> >>>for >> >>> >>the >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> tweets. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates >> >>> >><ga...@hortonworks.com >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a primary >> >>> >> >>>> repository. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does. If this has >> >>>changed >> >>> >> >>>> (or >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> when it >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I don't care >> >>> >>which >> >>> >> >>>> we >> >>> >> >>>> use. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I think you >> can >> >>> >>apply >> >>> >> >>>> to >> >>> >> >>>> do >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> via >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the first >> >>>class >> >>> >> >>>> citizen of >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to work with >> >>>pig >> >>> >>is >> >>> >> >>>> just >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> another >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been bandied about >> >>>on >> >>> >> >>>> Twitter >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed seriously >> >>>on the >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv. >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> -- >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. >> >>> >>Please >> >>> >> >>>> email >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> me at >> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.* >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> >> >>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com >> >>> >> >>> datasyndrome.com >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > -- >> >>> >> > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com >> >>> >> datasyndrome.com >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com >> >>datasyndrome.com >> >> > > > -- > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com datasyndrome. > com > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com datasyndrome.com
