+1 to piggybank on github.

The one tricky part will be setting up the repos, build and artifact
publishing components in a way that handles dependency management of
version X of piggybank with version Y of Pig.


On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I agree.  I think we'll see a massive uptick in contributors to Piggybank
> if it is on github.  I think we can start getting companies like Twitter
> and LinkedIn to think about contributing to Piggybank instead of rolling
> their own github repos.
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <
> g...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > As I said, the integration is still cumbersome.
> > There are legal issues with not uploading patches to Jira.
> >
> > Anyway, +1 for moving Piggybank to git (github could be a good choice in
> > this case).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Gianmarco
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 06:48, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > No, that is not good :(
> > >
> > > Weekday for the hackathon?
> > >
> > > Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
> > >
> > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Russell, you saw that the Cassandra thing still requires people to
> > > > upload patches to JIRA?
> > > >
> > > > D
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Russell Jurney <
> > russell.jur...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> I prefer weekdays, but I'm flexible.
> > > >>
> > > >> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
> > > >>
> > > >> On Apr 3, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Jonathan Coveney <jcove...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Do people prefer a workday or a weekend?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2012/4/3 Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Ok, so we just need a date.  Twitter on April <blank> we will be
> > > moving
> > > >>>> piggybank to github (and other awesome things).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Major +1 for moving Piggybank to github.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Alan.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Russell Jurney wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Some more info is available here, for the Cassandra project:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4254
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cassandra
> > > >>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/HowToContribute
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I have a proposal to make... since we're not yet up for this,
> but
> > do
> > > >>>>> agree
> > > >>>>>> that it is the future: what if we move Piggybank to github?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> We can do this at the hackathon we're having at Twitter - I
> forgot
> > > the
> > > >>>>> date?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Scott Carey <
> > > sc...@richrelevance.com
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Git was built with use case #1 being Linux developers
> exchanging
> > > >>>> patches
> > > >>>>>>> as text via e-mail.  I am not sure what binary patch support
> > Linus
> > > >>>> plans
> > > >>>>>>> or what it would help other than being more compact.  One
> > > disadvantage
> > > >>>>> is
> > > >>>>>>> that it is then hard to review simple changes by simply reading
> > the
> > > >>>>> patch
> > > >>>>>>> itself in a text editor.  I have +1'd many near-trivial changes
> > > after
> > > >>>>> only
> > > >>>>>>> glancing at the text of the patch.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> SVN is (slowly) catching up to have better patch features.
>  'svn
> > > >>>> patch'
> > > >>>>> is
> > > >>>>>>> now in 1.7, 1.8 will enhance it, and eventually there is
> planned
> > > >>>> support
> > > >>>>>>> for git patch extensions. In the long run the differences
> between
> > > the
> > > >>>>>>> tools for day-to-day work will shrink from where it is now.
> > > >>>> Subversion
> > > >>>>> is
> > > >>>>>>> planning 'svn shelve' to make it more git-like when working
> > > locally,
> > > >>>> for
> > > >>>>>>> example.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 3/27/12 10:43 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <dvrya...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Could you enumerate the problems you have with text patches?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I can think of 1, but would like to hear your list.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Dmitriy
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Russell Jurney
> > > >>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> Using text patches is the problem as I see it.  We should be
> > > >>>> using...
> > > >>>>>>>>> something else.  Doesn't git's functionality enable phasing
> out
> > > text
> > > >>>>>>>>> patches?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Scott Carey
> > > >>>>>>>>> <sc...@richrelevance.com>wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On the Avro project, several folk generate a patch using git
> > and
> > > >>>>> upload
> > > >>>>>>>>>> that to the JIRA, it patches fine using unix 'patch'.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Why do you need to switch to svn to generate the patch?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> A committer needs to apply the patch to a location checked
> out
> > > with
> > > >>>>>>>>>> svn,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> but that is trivial.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/12 2:26 AM, "Gianmarco De Francisci Morales" <
> > > >>>>> g...@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents, based on the S4 project experience so far (they
> > > have
> > > >>>>> git)
> > > >>>>>>>>>> is
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> but later.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> The process with git is still a bit fuzzy and not fully
> > > integrated
> > > >>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> standardized like the one with svn.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I personally use git for all my dev work with Pig, but then
> > > switch
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>> svn
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> to generate the final patch. A bit cumbersome but not so
> bad.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Switching now will generate confusion and is not that
> urgent
> > > in my
> > > >>>>>>>>>> humble
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> opinion.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Gianmarco
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:27, Dmitriy Ryaboy <
> > > dvrya...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> There is a check box you check when you upload a patch. If
> > we
> > > >>>>>>>>>> committed
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> without verifying you checked it, thats an unfortunate
> > > oversight.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> No, you cant send a pull request via github to apache.
> > That's
> > > a
> > > >>>>>>>>>> github
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (commercial entity) feature, not a git (open source vcs)
> > > feature.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you can post a link on a Jira and ask people for
> review
> > > prior
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> submitting a formal patch.  No that's not review board or
> > Jira
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> integration.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Russell Jurney
> > > >>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> That is fine.  Only committers can merge pull requests.
> >  Not
> > > a
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> problem.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've never signed anything, and committers take my
> patches.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Works the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> same.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Carey
> > > >>>>>>>>>> <sc...@richrelevance.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a legal issue as well. Uploading a patch to
> JIRA
> > > >>>>>>>>>> requires
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> user to grant apache license to use the code.  A pull
> > > request
> > > >>>>>>>>>> from
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> github
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is all being hashed out elsewhere, none of us here
> > are
> > > >>>>>>>>>> experts.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/22/12 2:08 PM, "Russell Jurney" <
> > > russell.jur...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there is already a trial going, the project would
> > > benefit
> > > >>>>>>>>>> from
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switching
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull
> requests
> > on
> > > >>>>>>>>>> github.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits.
> > >  Barrier
> > > >>>>>>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> entry
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy
> > for
> > > >>>> all.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai
> > > >>>>>>>>>> <da...@hortonworks.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This can be done in the future but I don't see there
> is
> > an
> > > >>>>>>>>>> urgent
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> need
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize
> the
> > > >>>> process
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and we
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the
> > first
> > > >>>>>>>>>> several
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try and solve the infrastructure problem.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> jcove...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If people don't know git or svn, they are going to
> have
> > > to
> > > >>>>>>>>>> learn
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> one
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other if they want to work with open source projects.
> > It
> > > >>>>>>>>>> might as
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well be
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git, since that's where things are going.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the
> > > primary
> > > >>>>>>>>>> repo
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> using
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CouchDB project.  Other projects may be able to
> > > volunteer
> > > >>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>> join
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trial, I'm not sure.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest that if you are interested in this join
> the
> > > >>>> apache
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infrastructure-dev list.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney"
> > > >>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's the work?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy
> > > >>>>>>>>>> <dvrya...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do
> > the
> > > >>>> work.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do we have to do to be the first real
> project
> > > that
> > > >>>>>>>>>> uses
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> git?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will propel the project forward.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter.com/rjurney
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <billgra...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire
> > > >>>> discussion
> > > >>>>>>>>>> tree
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some
> > incubator
> > > >>>>>>>>>> projects
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed.
> > > >>>> Looking
> > > >>>>>>>>>> for
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tweets.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <ga...@hortonworks.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a
> > > primary
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does.  If
> this
> > > has
> > > >>>>>>>>>> changed
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when it
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I
> > don't
> > > >>>> care
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> which
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I
> think
> > > you
> > > >>>> can
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> apply
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the
> > > first
> > > >>>>>>>>>> class
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizen of
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to
> work
> > > with
> > > >>>>>>>>>> pig
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been
> bandied
> > > about
> > > >>>>>>>>>> on
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed
> > > seriously
> > > >>>>>>>>>> on the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email
> > > address.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me at
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.*
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney
> > > russell.jur...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney
> > russell.jur...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
> > > >>>>> datasyndrome.com
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
> > > >>>> datasyndrome.com
> > > >>>>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
> datasyndrome.com
>



-- 
*Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at
billgra...@gmail.com going forward.*

Reply via email to