Ok, so we just need a date. Twitter on April <blank> we will be moving piggybank to github (and other awesome things).
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Major +1 for moving Piggybank to github. > > Alan. > > On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Russell Jurney wrote: > > > Some more info is available here, for the Cassandra project: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4254 > > https://github.com/apache/cassandra > > http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/HowToContribute > > > > I have a proposal to make... since we're not yet up for this, but do > agree > > that it is the future: what if we move Piggybank to github? > > > > We can do this at the hackathon we're having at Twitter - I forgot the > date? > > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com > >wrote: > > > >> Git was built with use case #1 being Linux developers exchanging patches > >> as text via e-mail. I am not sure what binary patch support Linus plans > >> or what it would help other than being more compact. One disadvantage > is > >> that it is then hard to review simple changes by simply reading the > patch > >> itself in a text editor. I have +1'd many near-trivial changes after > only > >> glancing at the text of the patch. > >> > >> SVN is (slowly) catching up to have better patch features. 'svn patch' > is > >> now in 1.7, 1.8 will enhance it, and eventually there is planned support > >> for git patch extensions. In the long run the differences between the > >> tools for day-to-day work will shrink from where it is now. Subversion > is > >> planning 'svn shelve' to make it more git-like when working locally, for > >> example. > >> > >> On 3/27/12 10:43 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Could you enumerate the problems you have with text patches? > >>> > >>> I can think of 1, but would like to hear your list. > >>> > >>> Dmitriy > >>> > >>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Russell Jurney > >>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Using text patches is the problem as I see it. We should be using... > >>>> something else. Doesn't git's functionality enable phasing out text > >>>> patches? > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Scott Carey > >>>> <sc...@richrelevance.com>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On the Avro project, several folk generate a patch using git and > upload > >>>>> that to the JIRA, it patches fine using unix 'patch'. > >>>>> Why do you need to switch to svn to generate the patch? > >>>>> > >>>>> A committer needs to apply the patch to a location checked out with > >>>>> svn, > >>>>> but that is trivial. > >>>>> > >>>>> On 3/27/12 2:26 AM, "Gianmarco De Francisci Morales" < > g...@apache.org> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> My 2 cents, based on the S4 project experience so far (they have > git) > >>>>> is > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> but later. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The process with git is still a bit fuzzy and not fully integrated > and > >>>>>> standardized like the one with svn. > >>>>>> I personally use git for all my dev work with Pig, but then switch > to > >>>>> svn > >>>>>> to generate the final patch. A bit cumbersome but not so bad. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Switching now will generate confusion and is not that urgent in my > >>>>> humble > >>>>>> opinion. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Gianmarco > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:27, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> There is a check box you check when you upload a patch. If we > >>>>> committed > >>>>>>> without verifying you checked it, thats an unfortunate oversight. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No, you cant send a pull request via github to apache. That's a > >>>>> github > >>>>>>> (commercial entity) feature, not a git (open source vcs) feature. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yes you can post a link on a Jira and ask people for review prior > to > >>>>>>> submitting a formal patch. No that's not review board or Jira > >>>>>>> integration. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Russell Jurney > >>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> That is fine. Only committers can merge pull requests. Not a > >>>>>>> problem. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I've never signed anything, and committers take my patches. > >>>>> Works the > >>>>>>> same. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Carey > >>>>> <sc...@richrelevance.com > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> There is a legal issue as well. Uploading a patch to JIRA > >>>>> requires > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> user to grant apache license to use the code. A pull request > >>>>> from > >>>>>>> github > >>>>>>>>> does not. > >>>>>>>>> This is all being hashed out elsewhere, none of us here are > >>>>> experts. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 3/22/12 2:08 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> If there is already a trial going, the project would benefit > >>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>> switching > >>>>>>>>>> to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull requests on > >>>>> github. > >>>>>>> Maybe > >>>>>>>>>> not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits. Barrier > >>>>> of > >>>>>>> entry > >>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>> contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy for all. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai > >>>>> <da...@hortonworks.com> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> This can be done in the future but I don't see there is an > >>>>> urgent > >>>>>>> need > >>>>>>>>>>> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize the process > >>>>>>> and we > >>>>>>>>>>> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the first > >>>>> several > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> try and solve the infrastructure problem. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney < > >>>>>>> jcove...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> If people don't know git or svn, they are going to have to > >>>>> learn > >>>>>>> one > >>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> other if they want to work with open source projects. It > >>>>> might as > >>>>>>>>>>> well be > >>>>>>>>>>>> git, since that's where things are going. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the primary > >>>>> repo > >>>>>>> using > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> CouchDB project. Other projects may be able to volunteer to > >>>>> join > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> trial, I'm not sure. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest that if you are interested in this join the apache > >>>>>>>>>>>>> infrastructure-dev list. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney" > >>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's the work? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy > >>>>> <dvrya...@gmail.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do the work. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney < > >>>>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do we have to do to be the first real project that > >>>>> uses > >>>>>>> git? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will propel the project forward. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter.com/rjurney > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham > >>>>>>> <billgra...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire discussion > >>>>> tree > >>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some incubator > >>>>> projects > >>>>>>>>>>> were > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed. Looking > >>>>> for > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tweets. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates > >>>>>>> <ga...@hortonworks.com > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a primary > >>>>>>>>>>> repository. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does. If this has > >>>>> changed > >>>>>>>>>>> (or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I don't care > >>>>>>> which > >>>>>>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>>> use. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I think you can > >>>>>>> apply > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> do > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the first > >>>>> class > >>>>>>>>>>> citizen of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to work with > >>>>> pig > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>> just > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been bandied about > >>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>> Twitter > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed seriously > >>>>> on the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. > >>>>>>> Please > >>>>>>>>>>> email > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.* > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>>>>>> datasyndrome.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > >>>> datasyndrome.com > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com > datasyndrome.com > > -- Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com datasyndrome.com
