Russell, you saw that the Cassandra thing still requires people to
upload patches to JIRA?

D

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I prefer weekdays, but I'm flexible.
>
> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
>
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 5:11 PM, Jonathan Coveney <jcove...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do people prefer a workday or a weekend?
>>
>> 2012/4/3 Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Ok, so we just need a date.  Twitter on April <blank> we will be moving
>>> piggybank to github (and other awesome things).
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Major +1 for moving Piggybank to github.
>>>>
>>>> Alan.
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Russell Jurney wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Some more info is available here, for the Cassandra project:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4254
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/cassandra
>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/HowToContribute
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a proposal to make... since we're not yet up for this, but do
>>>> agree
>>>>> that it is the future: what if we move Piggybank to github?
>>>>>
>>>>> We can do this at the hackathon we're having at Twitter - I forgot the
>>>> date?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Git was built with use case #1 being Linux developers exchanging
>>> patches
>>>>>> as text via e-mail.  I am not sure what binary patch support Linus
>>> plans
>>>>>> or what it would help other than being more compact.  One disadvantage
>>>> is
>>>>>> that it is then hard to review simple changes by simply reading the
>>>> patch
>>>>>> itself in a text editor.  I have +1'd many near-trivial changes after
>>>> only
>>>>>> glancing at the text of the patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SVN is (slowly) catching up to have better patch features.  'svn
>>> patch'
>>>> is
>>>>>> now in 1.7, 1.8 will enhance it, and eventually there is planned
>>> support
>>>>>> for git patch extensions. In the long run the differences between the
>>>>>> tools for day-to-day work will shrink from where it is now.
>>> Subversion
>>>> is
>>>>>> planning 'svn shelve' to make it more git-like when working locally,
>>> for
>>>>>> example.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/27/12 10:43 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you enumerate the problems you have with text patches?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can think of 1, but would like to hear your list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dmitriy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Russell Jurney
>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Using text patches is the problem as I see it.  We should be
>>> using...
>>>>>>>> something else.  Doesn't git's functionality enable phasing out text
>>>>>>>> patches?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Scott Carey
>>>>>>>> <sc...@richrelevance.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On the Avro project, several folk generate a patch using git and
>>>> upload
>>>>>>>>> that to the JIRA, it patches fine using unix 'patch'.
>>>>>>>>> Why do you need to switch to svn to generate the patch?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A committer needs to apply the patch to a location checked out with
>>>>>>>>> svn,
>>>>>>>>> but that is trivial.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 3/27/12 2:26 AM, "Gianmarco De Francisci Morales" <
>>>> g...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My 2 cents, based on the S4 project experience so far (they have
>>>> git)
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>> but later.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The process with git is still a bit fuzzy and not fully integrated
>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> standardized like the one with svn.
>>>>>>>>>> I personally use git for all my dev work with Pig, but then switch
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> svn
>>>>>>>>>> to generate the final patch. A bit cumbersome but not so bad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Switching now will generate confusion and is not that urgent in my
>>>>>>>>> humble
>>>>>>>>>> opinion.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Gianmarco
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:27, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> There is a check box you check when you upload a patch. If we
>>>>>>>>> committed
>>>>>>>>>>> without verifying you checked it, thats an unfortunate oversight.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, you cant send a pull request via github to apache. That's a
>>>>>>>>> github
>>>>>>>>>>> (commercial entity) feature, not a git (open source vcs) feature.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you can post a link on a Jira and ask people for review prior
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> submitting a formal patch.  No that's not review board or Jira
>>>>>>>>>>> integration.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Russell Jurney
>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That is fine.  Only committers can merge pull requests.  Not a
>>>>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've never signed anything, and committers take my patches.
>>>>>>>>> Works the
>>>>>>>>>>> same.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Carey
>>>>>>>>> <sc...@richrelevance.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a legal issue as well. Uploading a patch to JIRA
>>>>>>>>> requires
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> user to grant apache license to use the code.  A pull request
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> github
>>>>>>>>>>>>> does not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is all being hashed out elsewhere, none of us here are
>>>>>>>>> experts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/22/12 2:08 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jur...@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there is already a trial going, the project would benefit
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switching
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull requests on
>>>>>>>>> github.
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits.  Barrier
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> entry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy for
>>> all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai
>>>>>>>>> <da...@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This can be done in the future but I don't see there is an
>>>>>>>>> urgent
>>>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize the
>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>> and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the first
>>>>>>>>> several
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try and solve the infrastructure problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney <
>>>>>>>>>>> jcove...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If people don't know git or svn, they are going to have to
>>>>>>>>> learn
>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other if they want to work with open source projects. It
>>>>>>>>> might as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git, since that's where things are going.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <sc...@richrelevance.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the primary
>>>>>>>>> repo
>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CouchDB project.  Other projects may be able to volunteer
>>> to
>>>>>>>>> join
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trial, I'm not sure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest that if you are interested in this join the
>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infrastructure-dev list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney"
>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What's the work?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy
>>>>>>>>> <dvrya...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do the
>>> work.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do we have to do to be the first real project that
>>>>>>>>> uses
>>>>>>>>>>> git?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It will propel the project forward.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter.com/rjurney
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> russell.jur...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham
>>>>>>>>>>> <billgra...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire
>>> discussion
>>>>>>>>> tree
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some incubator
>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed.
>>> Looking
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tweets.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates
>>>>>>>>>>> <ga...@hortonworks.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a primary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does.  If this has
>>>>>>>>> changed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I don't
>>> care
>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I think you
>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>> apply
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the first
>>>>>>>>> class
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizen of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to work with
>>>>>>>>> pig
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been bandied about
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed seriously
>>>>>>>>> on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address.
>>>>>>>>>>> Please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
>>>> datasyndrome.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jur...@gmail.com
>>> datasyndrome.com
>>>

Reply via email to