> 2. *Performance and Stability*: I personally use Zulip Desktop on Linux and the Zulip App on my phone and do not recall any serious performance and stability problems.
There was one event a long time ago, when a new desktop client version became unusable, but it was solved quickly with a patch version.... IIRC. Cheers, Dmitri. On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 1:26 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > I’d like to propose transitioning our chat platform from Zulip to Slack. > While both platforms have their strengths, I believe Slack offers a more > robust and widely adopted solution for our needs. > > > *Why Consider Slack?* > > 1. *Broader Adoption*: Slack is widely used across organizations, making > it easier for new members or collaborators to join and chat seamlessly. > 2. *Performance and Stability*: Slack consistently outperforms Zulip in > terms of reliability. I’ve experienced occasional crashes with Zulip on > my > laptop, which can disrupt productivity. > 3. *Retention Period*: Slack provides a shorter retention period for > chat history. However, this should suffice as chat tools are primarily > used > for quick responses. For more formal communication, such as proposals, > release votes, or other critical discussions, we will continue to > prioritize the use of email lists. > > *Proposed Transition Plan* > > - *Gradual Rollout*: We can implement Slack alongside Zulip for a > transition period of 3 months. This allows team members to adapt and > provide feedback before fully committing. > - *Historical Access*: We don’t need to shut down the Polaris Zulip > instance. Keeping it active ensures historical chat data remains > accessible > for future reference. > > I’d love to hear your thoughts on this proposal. If there’s interest, I can > take the lead on outlining next steps, including setting up Slack and > ensuring a smooth transition for the team. > > > Looking forward to your feedback! > > > Yufei >
