I entirely agree with everyone else. I hope the PIO community will become more active after graduation.
> 2. If we are to graduate, who should we include in the list of the initial > PMC? Don't all present IPMC members are included in the list of the initial PMC? Personally, I think we may as well check and see if present IPMC members intend to become an initial PMC for graduation. Members who make a declaration of intent to become it will surely contribute to the project. It is a great contribution not only to develop a program but also to respond to email aggressively or fix document. 2017-08-29 14:20 GMT+09:00 Donald Szeto <don...@apache.org>: > Hi all, > > Since the ASF Board meeting in May ( > http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2017/board_minutes_2017_05_17.txt), > PredictionIO has been considered nearing graduation and I think we are > almost there. I am kickstarting this thread so that we can discuss on these > 3 things: > > 1. Does the development community feel ready to graduate? > 2. If we are to graduate, who should we include in the list of the initial > PMC? > 3. If we are to graduate, who should be the VP of the initial PMC? > > These points are relevant for graduation. Please take a look at the > official graduation guide: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html. > > In addition, Sara and I have been working to transfer the PredictionIO > trademark to the ASF. We will keep you updated with our progress. > > I would also like to propose to cut a 0.12.0 release by merging JIRAs that > have a target version set to 0.12.0-incubating for graduation. 0.12.0 will > contain cleanups for minor license and copyright issues that were pointed > out in previous releases by IPMC. > > Let me know what you think. > > Regards, > Donald