Joe, that is correct, that person would be someone from ASF INFRA team, once we open a ticket to request it. Is there any concern from Yahoo perspective to give admin permission on the repo for the migration?
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:12 AM Joe Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > From talking to the relevant folks here at Yahoo, it seems github requires > that the person doing the transfer needs to have have admin rights on both > the source and destination repos. > Joe > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 1:07 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Joe, > > I see that the secretary has registered the SGA in the Foundation archives. > > I’ve updated the status page to include this fact along with the list of > initial committers. So far 8 of the 16 initial committers have iCLAs on > file. > > Regards, > Dave > > > On Jun 8, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Joe F <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The SGA has just been submitted. > > > > Joe > > > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Folks, > >> > >> Please respond to emails here and discuss the podling. In order to move > to > >> the incubator we need to start talking. > >> > >>> On Jun 5, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> I hope everyone already subscribed this mailing list already. > >> > >> Several iCLAs were processed by the ASF secretary on Friday. Accounts > >> should be setup and I will add to the LDAP groups tomorrow. > >> > >>> > >>> I wanted to start the discussion on multiple points for onboarding into > >> the > >>> incubator. > >>> > >>> First of all, which tools we want to keep using when moving the > >> development > >>> over at the ASF. > >>> > >>> In particular, we need to chose about: > >>> 1. Git repository and committer workflow > >>> 2. Github issues vs JIRA > >> > >> The proposal requested a JIRA which I requested and is now available at > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PULSAR/ > >> > >> If the project wishes to switch to Github issues that would be fine. > >> > >>> 3. Jenkins vs Travis for CI > >>> > >>> The support for using Github tools for Apache project has been a recent > >>> addition. Masakazu pointed to me that it was actually discussed at the > >>> latest ApacheCon (https://youtu.be/yWurOHvm5WM?t=1078) and that right > >> now > >>> INFRA is supporting projects to use Github as the primary repository > and > >>> issues. > >>> > >>> I think for us it would make sense to continue using Github tools that > >> has > >>> worked reasonably well in the past and it will be frictionless both > from > >>> our perspective as for potential contributors. > >>> > >>> The other point would be to directly transfer the repository from > >>> "yahoo/pulsar" to "apache/incubator-pulsar", instead of creating a new > >>> repo. > >>> The advantage would be to keep all the current issues/PRs, plus people > >> that > >>> are subscribed to the repository events. > >>> > >>> I think that the logistic for this would be to give access to > >> yahoo/pulsar > >>> repo to ASF INFRA so that they can perform the switch. > >> > >> We need to have a discussion on this. We can discuss Consensus as part > of > >> the discussion. > >> > >>> > >>> About the SGA from Yahoo, Joe can you also update here whenever the > grant > >>> is submitted? > >>> > >>> Finally, when repository and grant aspects are resolved, I would > suggest > >> to > >>> make one last release (1.18), ASAP, before moving the code over to the > >>> ASF. The reason is that we have already accumulated lot of changes and > >>> fixes in the current master and that it will take us some amount of > time > >> to > >>> prepare well for an official release within the incubator. > >>> We will need to sort lot of details and possibly make multiple > iterations > >>> before we can be ready for a release. > >> > >> If you want to do a release on the old infrastructure then perhaps that > is > >> first. > >> > >>> > >>> So, release what we have right now, and then concentrate in making a > >> proper > >>> release in the incubator (detached from the amount of "features" > >> contained). > >>> > >>> Any thoughts / opinions? > >>> > >>> Please also raise any other point or question that I have missed. > >>> > >>> Matteo > >> > >> Regards, > >> Dave > >> > >> > >> > > >
