Daniel (pono) has been granted admin. Please proceed with the transfer
Joe
On Tuesday, June 20, 2017 1:21 PM, Daniel Takamori <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello from Infra :)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14376?focusedCommentId=16056392&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16056392
For verification.
My Github ID is pono so once someone makes me an admin of the org I can
transfer (just the https://github.com/yahoo/pulsar repo?) into the Apache
organization.
Feel free to join on http://infra.chat so we can coordinate in real time if you
would prefer.
Cheers.
On 2017-06-19 13:53 (-0700), Matteo Merli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> on our end, the release 1.18 went out on Friday, so we're ready for the
> transfer to happen.
>
> Matteo
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 2:00 PM Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The INFRA JIRA issue is submitted:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14376
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> > > On Jun 16, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I was thinking this would be a copy rather than a rename.
> > >> If it is just a rename then that could interfere with the stated desire
> > > to do one more release.
> > >
> > > The release 1.18 should be out in the next few hours. After that we'll
> > > focus on aligning to the Apache incubator release process.
> > >
> > > Renaming the old repository has the advantage of keeping the current
> > issues
> > > / PR, people watching the repo and getting notifications about changes on
> > > it. It's a pretty smooth transition from that point of view.
> > >
> > > To create new tags in the 1.18 release, Yahoo can always fork the
> > > repository back (eg: yahoo/incubator-pulsar) and add tags in there.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:59 AM Dave Fisher <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >>> On Jun 16, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> That would be transferring the repository organization ownership and
> > >>> renaming from yahoo/pulsar into apache/incubator-pulsar.
> > >>
> > >> I was thinking this would be a copy rather than a rename.
> > >>
> > >> If it is just a rename then that could interfere with the stated desire
> > to
> > >> do one more release.
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> Everything in the repo will be moved. Then we would need to add write
> > >>> permissions for the committer to write.
> > >>
> > >> Yes the Infra admin would be granting write permissions to the initial
> > >> committers and mentors.
> > >>
> > >> I think we will all need to associate a GitHub account with our Apache
> > ID
> > >> through id.apache.org.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Dave
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:42 PM Dave Fisher <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Joe,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I will create an Infra JIRA for this task. Who is the Yahoo contact
> > who
> > >>>> can grant access?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We want to move source code and issues. Anything else?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Dave
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Jun 15, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Joe F <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Mentors,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I have got confirmation that Yahoo can give admin rights to the
> > pulsar
> > >>>>> repo to someone in ASF infra team. Let me know who, and I will get it
> > >>>> going
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Joe
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Matteo Merli <
> > [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Joe, that is correct, that person would be someone from ASF INFRA
> > >> team,
> > >>>>>> once we open a ticket to request it.
> > >>>>>> Is there any concern from Yahoo perspective to give admin permission
> > >> on
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>> repo for the migration?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:12 AM Joe Francis
> > >> <[email protected]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> From talking to the relevant folks here at Yahoo, it seems github
> > >>>>>> requires
> > >>>>>>> that the person doing the transfer needs to have have admin rights
> > on
> > >>>>>> both
> > >>>>>>> the source and destination repos.
> > >>>>>>> Joe
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Friday, June 9, 2017 1:07 PM, Dave Fisher <
> > >> [email protected]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi Joe,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I see that the secretary has registered the SGA in the Foundation
> > >>>>>> archives.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I’ve updated the status page to include this fact along with the
> > list
> > >>>> of
> > >>>>>>> initial committers. So far 8 of the 16 initial committers have
> > iCLAs
> > >> on
> > >>>>>>> file.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>> Dave
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Joe F <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> The SGA has just been submitted.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Joe
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Dave Fisher <
> > [email protected]>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Please respond to emails here and discuss the podling. In order
> > to
> > >>>>>> move
> > >>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>> the incubator we need to start talking.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 5, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I hope everyone already subscribed this mailing list already.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Several iCLAs were processed by the ASF secretary on Friday.
> > >> Accounts
> > >>>>>>>>> should be setup and I will add to the LDAP groups tomorrow.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I wanted to start the discussion on multiple points for
> > onboarding
> > >>>>>> into
> > >>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> incubator.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> First of all, which tools we want to keep using when moving the
> > >>>>>>>>> development
> > >>>>>>>>>> over at the ASF.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> In particular, we need to chose about:
> > >>>>>>>>>> 1. Git repository and committer workflow
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2. Github issues vs JIRA
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> The proposal requested a JIRA which I requested and is now
> > >> available
> > >>>>>> at
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PULSAR/
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> If the project wishes to switch to Github issues that would be
> > >> fine.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 3. Jenkins vs Travis for CI
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> The support for using Github tools for Apache project has been a
> > >>>>>> recent
> > >>>>>>>>>> addition. Masakazu pointed to me that it was actually discussed
> > at
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> latest ApacheCon (https://youtu.be/yWurOHvm5WM?t=1078) and that
> > >>>>>> right
> > >>>>>>>>> now
> > >>>>>>>>>> INFRA is supporting projects to use Github as the primary
> > >> repository
> > >>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>> issues.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I think for us it would make sense to continue using Github
> > tools
> > >>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>> has
> > >>>>>>>>>> worked reasonably well in the past and it will be frictionless
> > >> both
> > >>>>>>> from
> > >>>>>>>>>> our perspective as for potential contributors.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> The other point would be to directly transfer the repository
> > from
> > >>>>>>>>>> "yahoo/pulsar" to "apache/incubator-pulsar", instead of
> > creating a
> > >>>>>> new
> > >>>>>>>>>> repo.
> > >>>>>>>>>> The advantage would be to keep all the current issues/PRs, plus
> > >>>>>> people
> > >>>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>>>> are subscribed to the repository events.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I think that the logistic for this would be to give access to
> > >>>>>>>>> yahoo/pulsar
> > >>>>>>>>>> repo to ASF INFRA so that they can perform the switch.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> We need to have a discussion on this. We can discuss Consensus as
> > >>>> part
> > >>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>> the discussion.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> About the SGA from Yahoo, Joe can you also update here whenever
> > >> the
> > >>>>>>> grant
> > >>>>>>>>>> is submitted?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Finally, when repository and grant aspects are resolved, I would
> > >>>>>>> suggest
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> make one last release (1.18), ASAP, before moving the code over
> > >> to
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> ASF. The reason is that we have already accumulated lot of
> > changes
> > >>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>> fixes in the current master and that it will take us some amount
> > >> of
> > >>>>>>> time
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>> prepare well for an official release within the incubator.
> > >>>>>>>>>> We will need to sort lot of details and possibly make multiple
> > >>>>>>> iterations
> > >>>>>>>>>> before we can be ready for a release.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> If you want to do a release on the old infrastructure then
> > perhaps
> > >>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>> first.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> So, release what we have right now, and then concentrate in
> > >> making a
> > >>>>>>>>> proper
> > >>>>>>>>>> release in the incubator (detached from the amount of "features"
> > >>>>>>>>> contained).
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts / opinions?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Please also raise any other point or question that I have
> > missed.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Matteo
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>> Dave
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
