Mentors, I have got confirmation that Yahoo can give admin rights to the pulsar repo to someone in ASF infra team. Let me know who, and I will get it going
Joe On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> wrote: > Joe, that is correct, that person would be someone from ASF INFRA team, > once we open a ticket to request it. > Is there any concern from Yahoo perspective to give admin permission on the > repo for the migration? > > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:12 AM Joe Francis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From talking to the relevant folks here at Yahoo, it seems github > requires > > that the person doing the transfer needs to have have admin rights on > both > > the source and destination repos. > > Joe > > > > On Friday, June 9, 2017 1:07 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > I see that the secretary has registered the SGA in the Foundation > archives. > > > > I’ve updated the status page to include this fact along with the list of > > initial committers. So far 8 of the 16 initial committers have iCLAs on > > file. > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > > On Jun 8, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Joe F <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The SGA has just been submitted. > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Folks, > > >> > > >> Please respond to emails here and discuss the podling. In order to > move > > to > > >> the incubator we need to start talking. > > >> > > >>> On Jun 5, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi All, > > >>> > > >>> I hope everyone already subscribed this mailing list already. > > >> > > >> Several iCLAs were processed by the ASF secretary on Friday. Accounts > > >> should be setup and I will add to the LDAP groups tomorrow. > > >> > > >>> > > >>> I wanted to start the discussion on multiple points for onboarding > into > > >> the > > >>> incubator. > > >>> > > >>> First of all, which tools we want to keep using when moving the > > >> development > > >>> over at the ASF. > > >>> > > >>> In particular, we need to chose about: > > >>> 1. Git repository and committer workflow > > >>> 2. Github issues vs JIRA > > >> > > >> The proposal requested a JIRA which I requested and is now available > at > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PULSAR/ > > >> > > >> If the project wishes to switch to Github issues that would be fine. > > >> > > >>> 3. Jenkins vs Travis for CI > > >>> > > >>> The support for using Github tools for Apache project has been a > recent > > >>> addition. Masakazu pointed to me that it was actually discussed at > the > > >>> latest ApacheCon (https://youtu.be/yWurOHvm5WM?t=1078) and that > right > > >> now > > >>> INFRA is supporting projects to use Github as the primary repository > > and > > >>> issues. > > >>> > > >>> I think for us it would make sense to continue using Github tools > that > > >> has > > >>> worked reasonably well in the past and it will be frictionless both > > from > > >>> our perspective as for potential contributors. > > >>> > > >>> The other point would be to directly transfer the repository from > > >>> "yahoo/pulsar" to "apache/incubator-pulsar", instead of creating a > new > > >>> repo. > > >>> The advantage would be to keep all the current issues/PRs, plus > people > > >> that > > >>> are subscribed to the repository events. > > >>> > > >>> I think that the logistic for this would be to give access to > > >> yahoo/pulsar > > >>> repo to ASF INFRA so that they can perform the switch. > > >> > > >> We need to have a discussion on this. We can discuss Consensus as part > > of > > >> the discussion. > > >> > > >>> > > >>> About the SGA from Yahoo, Joe can you also update here whenever the > > grant > > >>> is submitted? > > >>> > > >>> Finally, when repository and grant aspects are resolved, I would > > suggest > > >> to > > >>> make one last release (1.18), ASAP, before moving the code over to > the > > >>> ASF. The reason is that we have already accumulated lot of changes > and > > >>> fixes in the current master and that it will take us some amount of > > time > > >> to > > >>> prepare well for an official release within the incubator. > > >>> We will need to sort lot of details and possibly make multiple > > iterations > > >>> before we can be ready for a release. > > >> > > >> If you want to do a release on the old infrastructure then perhaps > that > > is > > >> first. > > >> > > >>> > > >>> So, release what we have right now, and then concentrate in making a > > >> proper > > >>> release in the incubator (detached from the amount of "features" > > >> contained). > > >>> > > >>> Any thoughts / opinions? > > >>> > > >>> Please also raise any other point or question that I have missed. > > >>> > > >>> Matteo > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Dave > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >
