> On Jun 16, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> wrote: > > That would be transferring the repository organization ownership and > renaming from yahoo/pulsar into apache/incubator-pulsar.
I was thinking this would be a copy rather than a rename. If it is just a rename then that could interfere with the stated desire to do one more release. > > Everything in the repo will be moved. Then we would need to add write > permissions for the committer to write. Yes the Infra admin would be granting write permissions to the initial committers and mentors. I think we will all need to associate a GitHub account with our Apache ID through id.apache.org. Regards, Dave > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:42 PM Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Joe, >> >> I will create an Infra JIRA for this task. Who is the Yahoo contact who >> can grant access? >> >> We want to move source code and issues. Anything else? >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jun 15, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Joe F <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Mentors, >>> >>> I have got confirmation that Yahoo can give admin rights to the pulsar >>> repo to someone in ASF infra team. Let me know who, and I will get it >> going >>> >>> Joe >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Joe, that is correct, that person would be someone from ASF INFRA team, >>>> once we open a ticket to request it. >>>> Is there any concern from Yahoo perspective to give admin permission on >> the >>>> repo for the migration? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:12 AM Joe Francis <[email protected] >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From talking to the relevant folks here at Yahoo, it seems github >>>> requires >>>>> that the person doing the transfer needs to have have admin rights on >>>> both >>>>> the source and destination repos. >>>>> Joe >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, June 9, 2017 1:07 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected] >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Joe, >>>>> >>>>> I see that the secretary has registered the SGA in the Foundation >>>> archives. >>>>> >>>>> I’ve updated the status page to include this fact along with the list >> of >>>>> initial committers. So far 8 of the 16 initial committers have iCLAs on >>>>> file. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Joe F <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The SGA has just been submitted. >>>>>> >>>>>> Joe >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please respond to emails here and discuss the podling. In order to >>>> move >>>>> to >>>>>>> the incubator we need to start talking. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 5, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I hope everyone already subscribed this mailing list already. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Several iCLAs were processed by the ASF secretary on Friday. Accounts >>>>>>> should be setup and I will add to the LDAP groups tomorrow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I wanted to start the discussion on multiple points for onboarding >>>> into >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> incubator. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> First of all, which tools we want to keep using when moving the >>>>>>> development >>>>>>>> over at the ASF. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In particular, we need to chose about: >>>>>>>> 1. Git repository and committer workflow >>>>>>>> 2. Github issues vs JIRA >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The proposal requested a JIRA which I requested and is now available >>>> at >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PULSAR/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If the project wishes to switch to Github issues that would be fine. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 3. Jenkins vs Travis for CI >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The support for using Github tools for Apache project has been a >>>> recent >>>>>>>> addition. Masakazu pointed to me that it was actually discussed at >>>> the >>>>>>>> latest ApacheCon (https://youtu.be/yWurOHvm5WM?t=1078) and that >>>> right >>>>>>> now >>>>>>>> INFRA is supporting projects to use Github as the primary repository >>>>> and >>>>>>>> issues. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think for us it would make sense to continue using Github tools >>>> that >>>>>>> has >>>>>>>> worked reasonably well in the past and it will be frictionless both >>>>> from >>>>>>>> our perspective as for potential contributors. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The other point would be to directly transfer the repository from >>>>>>>> "yahoo/pulsar" to "apache/incubator-pulsar", instead of creating a >>>> new >>>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>>> The advantage would be to keep all the current issues/PRs, plus >>>> people >>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> are subscribed to the repository events. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think that the logistic for this would be to give access to >>>>>>> yahoo/pulsar >>>>>>>> repo to ASF INFRA so that they can perform the switch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We need to have a discussion on this. We can discuss Consensus as >> part >>>>> of >>>>>>> the discussion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> About the SGA from Yahoo, Joe can you also update here whenever the >>>>> grant >>>>>>>> is submitted? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Finally, when repository and grant aspects are resolved, I would >>>>> suggest >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> make one last release (1.18), ASAP, before moving the code over to >>>> the >>>>>>>> ASF. The reason is that we have already accumulated lot of changes >>>> and >>>>>>>> fixes in the current master and that it will take us some amount of >>>>> time >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> prepare well for an official release within the incubator. >>>>>>>> We will need to sort lot of details and possibly make multiple >>>>> iterations >>>>>>>> before we can be ready for a release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you want to do a release on the old infrastructure then perhaps >>>> that >>>>> is >>>>>>> first. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, release what we have right now, and then concentrate in making a >>>>>>> proper >>>>>>>> release in the incubator (detached from the amount of "features" >>>>>>> contained). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any thoughts / opinions? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please also raise any other point or question that I have missed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Matteo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Dave >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
