Dave, on our end, the release 1.18 went out on Friday, so we're ready for the transfer to happen.
Matteo On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 2:00 PM Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > The INFRA JIRA issue is submitted: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14376 > > Regards, > Dave > > > On Jun 16, 2017, at 12:18 PM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I was thinking this would be a copy rather than a rename. > >> If it is just a rename then that could interfere with the stated desire > > to do one more release. > > > > The release 1.18 should be out in the next few hours. After that we'll > > focus on aligning to the Apache incubator release process. > > > > Renaming the old repository has the advantage of keeping the current > issues > > / PR, people watching the repo and getting notifications about changes on > > it. It's a pretty smooth transition from that point of view. > > > > To create new tags in the 1.18 release, Yahoo can always fork the > > repository back (eg: yahoo/incubator-pulsar) and add tags in there. > > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:59 AM Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >>> On Jun 16, 2017, at 9:48 AM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> That would be transferring the repository organization ownership and > >>> renaming from yahoo/pulsar into apache/incubator-pulsar. > >> > >> I was thinking this would be a copy rather than a rename. > >> > >> If it is just a rename then that could interfere with the stated desire > to > >> do one more release. > >> > >>> > >>> Everything in the repo will be moved. Then we would need to add write > >>> permissions for the committer to write. > >> > >> Yes the Infra admin would be granting write permissions to the initial > >> committers and mentors. > >> > >> I think we will all need to associate a GitHub account with our Apache > ID > >> through id.apache.org. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Dave > >> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 5:42 PM Dave Fisher <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Joe, > >>>> > >>>> I will create an Infra JIRA for this task. Who is the Yahoo contact > who > >>>> can grant access? > >>>> > >>>> We want to move source code and issues. Anything else? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Dave > >>>> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>> > >>>>> On Jun 15, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Joe F <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Mentors, > >>>>> > >>>>> I have got confirmation that Yahoo can give admin rights to the > pulsar > >>>>> repo to someone in ASF infra team. Let me know who, and I will get it > >>>> going > >>>>> > >>>>> Joe > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Matteo Merli < > [email protected] > >>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Joe, that is correct, that person would be someone from ASF INFRA > >> team, > >>>>>> once we open a ticket to request it. > >>>>>> Is there any concern from Yahoo perspective to give admin permission > >> on > >>>> the > >>>>>> repo for the migration? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:12 AM Joe Francis > >> <[email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> From talking to the relevant folks here at Yahoo, it seems github > >>>>>> requires > >>>>>>> that the person doing the transfer needs to have have admin rights > on > >>>>>> both > >>>>>>> the source and destination repos. > >>>>>>> Joe > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Friday, June 9, 2017 1:07 PM, Dave Fisher < > >> [email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Joe, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I see that the secretary has registered the SGA in the Foundation > >>>>>> archives. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I’ve updated the status page to include this fact along with the > list > >>>> of > >>>>>>> initial committers. So far 8 of the 16 initial committers have > iCLAs > >> on > >>>>>>> file. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Dave > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Jun 8, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Joe F <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The SGA has just been submitted. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Joe > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Dave Fisher < > [email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Folks, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Please respond to emails here and discuss the podling. In order > to > >>>>>> move > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> the incubator we need to start talking. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Jun 5, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I hope everyone already subscribed this mailing list already. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Several iCLAs were processed by the ASF secretary on Friday. > >> Accounts > >>>>>>>>> should be setup and I will add to the LDAP groups tomorrow. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I wanted to start the discussion on multiple points for > onboarding > >>>>>> into > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> incubator. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> First of all, which tools we want to keep using when moving the > >>>>>>>>> development > >>>>>>>>>> over at the ASF. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> In particular, we need to chose about: > >>>>>>>>>> 1. Git repository and committer workflow > >>>>>>>>>> 2. Github issues vs JIRA > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The proposal requested a JIRA which I requested and is now > >> available > >>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PULSAR/ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If the project wishes to switch to Github issues that would be > >> fine. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> 3. Jenkins vs Travis for CI > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The support for using Github tools for Apache project has been a > >>>>>> recent > >>>>>>>>>> addition. Masakazu pointed to me that it was actually discussed > at > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> latest ApacheCon (https://youtu.be/yWurOHvm5WM?t=1078) and that > >>>>>> right > >>>>>>>>> now > >>>>>>>>>> INFRA is supporting projects to use Github as the primary > >> repository > >>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>> issues. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I think for us it would make sense to continue using Github > tools > >>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>> has > >>>>>>>>>> worked reasonably well in the past and it will be frictionless > >> both > >>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>> our perspective as for potential contributors. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The other point would be to directly transfer the repository > from > >>>>>>>>>> "yahoo/pulsar" to "apache/incubator-pulsar", instead of > creating a > >>>>>> new > >>>>>>>>>> repo. > >>>>>>>>>> The advantage would be to keep all the current issues/PRs, plus > >>>>>> people > >>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>> are subscribed to the repository events. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I think that the logistic for this would be to give access to > >>>>>>>>> yahoo/pulsar > >>>>>>>>>> repo to ASF INFRA so that they can perform the switch. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> We need to have a discussion on this. We can discuss Consensus as > >>>> part > >>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> the discussion. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> About the SGA from Yahoo, Joe can you also update here whenever > >> the > >>>>>>> grant > >>>>>>>>>> is submitted? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Finally, when repository and grant aspects are resolved, I would > >>>>>>> suggest > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> make one last release (1.18), ASAP, before moving the code over > >> to > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> ASF. The reason is that we have already accumulated lot of > changes > >>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>> fixes in the current master and that it will take us some amount > >> of > >>>>>>> time > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>> prepare well for an official release within the incubator. > >>>>>>>>>> We will need to sort lot of details and possibly make multiple > >>>>>>> iterations > >>>>>>>>>> before we can be ready for a release. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If you want to do a release on the old infrastructure then > perhaps > >>>>>> that > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> first. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> So, release what we have right now, and then concentrate in > >> making a > >>>>>>>>> proper > >>>>>>>>>> release in the incubator (detached from the amount of "features" > >>>>>>>>> contained). > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts / opinions? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Please also raise any other point or question that I have > missed. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Matteo > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>> Dave > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
