On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:33:03AM +0100, Joerg Sievers wrote:
> 
> Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >Good (or rather bad) example of wasted ressources:
> >The build breaks on Mac. This has been reported in EIS. But you simply
> >ignored this and went one with the big testing.
> >
> >And even now you still ignore the breaker without even finding it
> >necessary to mention it with any word. 
> 
> that is not the truth: I have written a sentence there that I have seen 
> it 

You're kidding, right? I wrote that message on Wed, 14 Mar 2007, and now
look at the date of your comment: Was posted today. 
I postet the note about the build-breaker on Jan 21, on Feb 10 and again
on Mar 9. And only now you acknowlege to have read it? 

> but I have no rule, no process which hinders - from QA point of view 
> - the nomination.

And you're kidding even more: You have no rule that tells you that you
should reject anything that breaks the build? That cannot be true.

> ---------- Comment from jsi Do Mrz 15 09:15:20 +0100 2007 ----------
> 
> I have no idea if a red Tinderbox-entry will block something but I have 
> no rule that I have to look at it. From QA point of view the CWS is okay 
> for integration.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------

If you want to say: QA itself should not be bothered to check tinderbox
status themselves, then fine. But: I already checked the status for you
and told you it breaks. [1]

> _Release Engineering_ should have an interest to get the builds done on 
> all platforms otherwise they get more work to do.

[1] And even looking yourself whether it breaks or not is easy. EIS has
the tinderboxstatus built-in now. Just look at the color of the columns.
If somebody is color-blind and cannot distinguish the green from the
red, then just ask me to change the colors.

ciao
Christian
-- 
NP: Slipknot - Iowa
                           Join #qa.OpenOffice.org on irc.freenode.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to