Hi Jörg, *,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:40:45PM +0100, Joerg Sievers wrote:
> Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> >You're kidding, right?
>
> No, it's the job of developer/release engineers to avoid build breakers
> on all supported OOo platforms. I am not a member of those and have
> given the CWS now to release engineering because QA has done their work.
>
> Fedora Core 6 (Test 3) gcc-4.1.1 (sun-java) errors: 18
> Mac OSX gcc-4.0.1 (X11) errors: 119
> linux-gcc-4.0.2 (sun-java) errors: 23
>
> Sorry, but there there is no explanation for me that '23 errors' are
> green and '119 errors' are bad. Understand me right: Errors =
> buildbreakers was not communicated.
Becaue the number of errors are not equal to buildbreakers.
> Why 23 build breakers are okay, 121
> not... I don't know.
That number does not count the buildbreakers. The color tells you
whether it broke or not. Green = everything OK, Red: it broke.
The number tells you how many lines the logfile parser detected as
errorlines. Not all of them are "real" errors. Most of these errors are
because of the IDL-files
"errors" like:
[...]/package.html: warning - Tag @link: reference not found:
org.openoffice.xmerge
And again: With that cws it wasn't like you had to have a look yourself.
You were told that there is a breaker and were pointed to the logs, but
still ignored it.
ciao
Christian
--
NP: Slipknot - Iowa
Join #qa.OpenOffice.org on irc.freenode.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
