On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:08:04PM +0100, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: > > I saw many CWS in the last weeks and only some of them are green on > > all platforms. But I couldn't found one, without an error. > > So what should be the rules to reject a CWS, when 50 errors are shown, > > but the color is green, or when 20 errors are shown and it is violet > > or when 10 errors exists and it is red. > > That's in fact a problem. Those tinderbox stati in EIS have been > introduced without extensive explanation.
Wrong. It has been announced here and on at least the tools-ML. http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03936.html Since there has been no questions about it, one must assume that everyone did understand. > And personally, I don't > believe in those stati when *all* platforms tell me about errors, wiht > some fancy different colors, sigh. The colors is what really matters. See the other posts for that. > and I don't have a chance judging what > errors there actually are (the link to the tinderbox doesn't really > help, since the TB page doesn't show me the actual errors, Of course it does. If you don't see the status-box right on the first page, use the "show previous # hours" at the bottom of the table to go back in time. Then you should see the status-boxes. See e.g. http://go-oo.org/tinderbox/OOF680_m12/status.html Klick on one of the "l" "L" or "C" letters and a popup will open that provides links to the summary log and the full log. > nor does it > tell me somebody I could ask about the errors. The log does: http://go-oo.org/tinderbox/gunzip.cgi?tree=OOF680_m12&brief-log=1173950578.6754 tinderbox: administrator: Volker Quetschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://go-oo.org/tinderbox/gunzip.cgi?tree=OOF680_m12&brief-log=1173871152.13744 tinderbox: administrator: Christian Lohmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ergo: Tinderbox in EIS is not really useful ATM, sorry. And again I start shaking my had and start to get really sad. If you don't understand about tinderbox, why don't you ask for an explanation? Why do you ignore it instead and tell that it is useless? There really is a communication problem when QA-people don't read [EMAIL PROTECTED] ciao Christian -- NP: Pantera - Regular People (Conceit) Join #qa.OpenOffice.org on irc.freenode.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
